I’ve worked in SaaS tech my whole life. Been out of a job for a few months now, and while I do have debts to pay that would be much easier with a paycheck from the tech field, I wouldn’t be fulfilled with an office job.

The thing is, I’m not even sure what Id want to do yet. I’ve known my whole life that I was put here to help others, and there are so many causes out there I could work with that would help. So I think figuring that out is probably the very first step.

I’d also need to make above a certain threshold to be able to really function unless/even if I get a roommate (someone is checking my place out this month, so that might happen in January for me). Seems like figuring out what that number is between bills, rent, food, etc would be a good second step.

Beyond that, anyone else here made drastic career changes (I also don’t give a shit about having a “career”) that worked out for them like this? Would love any advice or tips! Tell me your story!

Thanks all, love you!

  • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    but are the material considerations of systems of exploitation not more pressing? it just seems silly to be talking about subconsciousnesses when everything you said (and i’d tack on the capitalists’ control over bourgeois government) is so much more salient

    e: but yeah you got me, it isn’t inherently marxian or not to talk about psychology shit.

    • Nagarjuna [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I agree, they are, but Graeber’s the type of dude to prioritize making a playful argument over making a rigorous one. Debt has a whole chapter arguing that Muslim banking is better than European Banking because it obeys Abrahamic usury laws. He then included a footnote basically saying “I know it’s still capitalist, I mostly wrote this chapter to troll evangelicals.”

      Like, he has brilliant insights, but not necessarily brilliant analysis. Take him as a supplement to your theory, not your main meal.

      • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        lmao he sounds like a fun read. i might do him eventually but i want a stronger sense of theoretical standards around those subject matters beforehand. i don’t want him to be the only one telling me how ancient banking worked

        Take him as a supplement to your theory, not your main meal

        uhhhhhhhhh yeah can i get a Mao sandwich hold the Deng, with some of those Graeber fries? and some Villa dip on the side please makima-think

        • Nagarjuna [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          can i get a Mao sandwich hold the Deng, with some of those Graeber fries

          Throw in the Situationist International and Midnight Notes and this is just my politics

        • Nagarjuna [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          IME, he’s solid on the anthropology, so he can be your guy on ancient baking. Just don’t let him be your guy on revolution.

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      but are the material considerations of systems of exploitation not more pressing?

      It is. We already know that highly exploited employees are often time the backbone of society. What’s more left to say other than bringing up math and statistics in a pop-socioeconomic book?