• LoremIpsum [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      China is making less than 1% green hydrogen right now, if they really can get it to 10% by 2030 id be very happy. But as far as I can see from that report, the plan is “invent some technology that makes this more efficient”. I think will happen eventually just not predictably enough to make a plot out to 2060 like hydrogen will be a good idea compared to other renewable technologies that will also advance in that time period.

      But anyway China is taking green energy seriously so they might as well try everything.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re right that there are unknowns and risks involved here. And I think you’re completely right that they’re trying a wide range of approaches to see what works for different kinds of use cases. I’m hopeful they figure this stuff out, somebody has to.

      • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        But anyway China is taking green energy seriously so they might as well try everything.

        I saw a survey that said 60% of china believes climate change is a real and important issues compared to less than 40% of Americans lol

        I never read the study but I always thought the charts were funny

      • wrecker_vs_dracula [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        As far as I am aware, hydrogen production at an industrial scale through water electrolysis has simply never been attempted before. They are in a situation where by default they have to invent some technology that makes this more efficient. I think the shape and composition of electrodes is still evolving rapidly, and they’re working on reducing the rate of their deterioration.

        • Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’d rather the money and research power be put into advancing electrolysis than soms war machine. I know it can be done. It just needs to be refined like any tech.

          If they are smart and synergistic about it, they can make a self sustaining program. Once they get there, they will have energy dominance and affordability. Other nations will replicate it and it will remove the motives for global conflict.

    • SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Playing half-Earth socialism, moving the dial from “blue hydrogen” to “green hydrogen” and hoping I don’t cause shortages