• xkforce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    They dont. It just happens that natural selection favored flowers that looked vaguely bird like and over time, flowers that looked more and more like a bird outcompeted the ones that looked less like one.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Appear to look like”…

    I wonder what they look like if you manage to ignore the appearances.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    8 months ago

    Animals are something plants invented to help spread their seeds around.

    • Tylix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Know what’s wild? For millions of years nothing around ate trees, so when a tree grew and died and fell it was permanently there because there was no rot. Which is how we got petrified forests.

      • bananabenana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        From my readings, I don’t think this is the case. Lignin degradation evolved rapidly with terrestrial plants. Coal and petrified wood is more due to geological events and swamps for example. Evolving ligninases is trivial for bacteria and fungi.

      • lorty@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Isn’t that more because of the lack of fungi that could break down wood?

    • Neil@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      Life in general is most likely something the universe invented to speed up entropy.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    “…how birds look like…”

    Just one of many issues with the English here.

    • what it looks like
    • how it looks

    You need to pick a lane.

    • Squirrel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I typically assume it’s a non-native speaker with things like this, but I’m not sure in this case.

      • Old_Fat_White_Guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I too try to give the benefit of the doubt when reading stilted text that basically conveys the meaning but the syntax is janky.

        I’m in southern Ohio so there are quite a few people from the hills and hollers around here.

        Methany definitely talks exactly like how that is.

    • cinnamonTea@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’d read this with commas around ‘like’, rather than with a period after it: “… how birds look, like, I’m afraid” works as a sentence while “… how birds look like. I’m afraid” is both wrong, like you point out, but also sounds much more serious than the jokey tone I’d expect from a message without punctuation and capitalization

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Did you understand what was being communicated? Yes? Congratulations!

      Because, really, that’s generally all that’s necessary.

    • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      No they’re asking how do birds look like the way they do. In which case the answer is that a bird’s body evolved to be streamlined and lightweight in order to fly more efficiently. /s

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    There are a lot of weird flowers out there

    Evolution is wonderfull

      • FarFarAway@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you’re into books, it’s also the first book in the Southern Reach Trilogy. The movie was good, but the books really flesh out the situation. I was sad they didn’t continue the movies with the rest of the books.

      • Amanduh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Just looked it up and it seems like a movie me and my wife would love. I’m surprised I’ve never seen or heard of it… do you have any more movie recs?

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Guess it depends on what you like. I would say that Annihilation is a good starting point for cosmic horror, and Event Horizon - I feel - falls into that. Prolly Sphere, too.

          My favorite sci-fi films are Bicentennial Man, The Matrix, Interstellar, Arrival, The Man From Earth, and Another Earth.

          The best Halloween film I’ve seen is Trick r Treat.

  • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    Doesn’t this imply that the flower is polinated by bird cocks. Think about it a bird fucks one flower or starts to before realizing, and then later he fucks annother flower thus spreading the pollen of the first flower.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      No, it just implies that it was adaptive to look like a bird.

      It could be for any number of reasons, including because aliens exist and years ago they were like “let’s screw up all the plants in this area for generations” until the leader’s kid saw one that kind of looked like little birds and threw themselves in front of it and said “wait, no, spare this one.”

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Most flighted birds don’t actually have functional penis (ducks are a notable exception). Both the males and females reproduce through their cloaca.

  • Poogona [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    That question below is honestly a good way to demonstrate how bad people can be at understanding what would be called materialism without it being explained to them first

    Easy to assume the shape of that flower is due to decisions made by the plant itself instead of the more accurate way of understanding its shape being the result of external conditions and pressures acting upon the plant and its flower growth over a long time

  • 7heo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Why are people so unfathomably dumb, like, I’m afraid.

  • ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    How do you know it’s not a bird trying to look like a plant? Y’know to evade predators and all…