• HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t know if a lot of tech needs to hire back. Outside of AI, tech adoption is on the right side of the adoption S-curve and most development time right now is going to revenue generation.

    And if you do need to hire back, you don’t need to hire from HCOL areas. Make the position full remote and price the salary to a LCOL area. You don’t need to pay a Bay Area wage any more.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        They will for new hires when they can pay them 50%.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t know if a lot of tech needs to hire back.

      I think many CEOs will see it that way. Better to underhire and ride their slop code base into further customer loss, data breaches, lawsuits and bankruptcy, than put up a weak quarter while something can still be done to save the business.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Has any data breach ever significantly hurt a company financially?

        • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Hard to say, for sure, in each case. There’s often plenty of factors that could have been key. Fuck-ups tend to fuck up in a variety of interesting ways.

          An obvious seeming one is Roomba’s infamous leaked person-on-toilet picture. I didn’t stop buying Roomba because I doubted their engineering. It was their (lack of a) Privacy team.