• telepresence@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    i kinda wanna say atomic habits. the concepts it presents are functional but it presents them in an extermly forgettable and uninteresting way.

  • TheV2@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s probably “Rich Dad, Poor Dad”. If you’re interested in any personal finance book, there is already nothing to learn.

  • frigidaphelion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    The bible. Set aside any religious connotations and just look at it as a piece of literature: it’s terrible.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        The handwaving “science” part. And then in the end there’s this deus ex machina plot point that comes out that makes all the rest of the plot utterly pointless.

        I’ve read a lot of SF, that was the worst because I had such high hope for it after reading what everyone had to say about it. And it turned me off reading anything that’s won a Hugo entirely. That and Redshirts…

      • blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It really puts your suspension of disbelief to the test, and all the characters are terrible. I actually thought the netflix show was better than the book because the characters were alot more relatable.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yah, totally forgot to mention how horrendously bad the characters were. Like 50’s SF bad.

        • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah same here, I thought it was one of the few cases where the adaptation was better than the book. It cuts out a lot of the waffle from the books and patches up lots of holes, especially with characters like you said.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I listened to Atlas Shrugged as an audio book and it was ok at best. One massive criticism of communism and how it doesn’t work but suggested anarchist society as the solution. Weird rape-y sex scene in the middle also. Should have stuck with the social criticism instead of anarco capitalism utopia stuff and it’d have been good.

  • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    The Great Gatsby.

    I’ve read a lot of books, but that one I literally remember nothing about. Not a quote, not a character, not the plot… All I remember is the cover was some weird abstract art piece with creepy eyes, my brain purged everything else about it book. Probably for my own sanity.

  • Muffi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Revelation Space by Alastair Reynolds. I am usually a huge SciFi fan, but I like the genre for it’s ability to reflect on humanity by extrapolating on current technologies/trends or comparing our culture to unique alien ones.

    Revelation Space was technobabble and descriptions of weapons for pages upon pages, and it was totally devoid of any philosophy or reflection on humanity. I never DNF a book, but this one I almost gave up on.

  • exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    “Meteor” by Dan Brown (could be a different name in the original language). It was the first time I read something that was bad. Up until then book were cool and fun and interesting. It was a puzzling experience.

    Edit: it’s called “Deception Point” in the original.

  • lloydxmas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Anything by David Foster Wallace. Smug, preachy stream of consciousness garbage that is then annotated to oblivion by more stream of consciousness smug preachiness.

  • slingstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I tried reading two different series from Stephen R. Donaldson, and it seemed to me he was somehow unable to write a book without a horrific rape. I just stopped reading the first book in each case because I felt like they were salacious and hateful.

  • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    ‘How to write with style’

    me, clueless thinking its going to be a good resource to help with my fiction writing

    Author in the first 50 pages;

    So heres why the USSR was evil

    bro who asked

  • Dumbkid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Alone with you in the ether. Both characters just bothered me with their weird ways of thinking. Could not relate to either of them