• HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      should be the case with all of them. If you don’t have two seperate, distinct hookups then there is no competition. And really should be half a dozen options.

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I have exactly 1 option of a variety of types. ATT fiber, ATT DSL, Spectrum cable, T-Mobile home service, etc. There is literally no overlap at each level. I suppose you could call that competition but the only ones really competing are ATT and Spectrum, and that’s only been in the last 6 months.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          They broke up the Bell Stystem in 1982 because it was monopoly. Cost to consumers went down the years following. Big national monopolies are a consumer cost

              • bdonvrA
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Yes, but not a monopoly held by private interest who want to milk it for every penny. It would be public and as such much easier to control through democratic means.

          • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            21 hours ago

            My town’s municipal power is significantly less expensive than all the national grid/eversource towns surrounding it.