Spanish climate activists sprayed red paint across a superyacht owned by billionaire Walmart heiress Nancy Walton Laurie in Barcelona on Friday, the second time the yacht has been the target of protests in the past two months.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone’s complaining that this doesn’t do anything and is counter productive, but you know what this looks like to me?

    Propaganda of the deed. Someone will look at this and think “I know better things to spray her superyacht with than paint…”

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They should put the billionaire on the bottom of the ocean, not the boat. The boat might be useful for something.

          • another_lemming@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Billionaire’s yacht? Hardly. But it may be scrapped. Expensive furniture and tech sold, high quality engine and parts repurposed.

        • DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, then her servants would have to start filing paperwork and have another yacht pulled out of storage while they design the new one.

        • LongbottomLeaf@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          ADMIRALTY ORDERS

          To Cpt. S. Technique

          ‘Intercept Walmart billionaire’s megayacht KAOS en route to extinction, INTENT ON CARRYING US ALL TO THOSE WATERS…Sink, Burn, or take her a Prize’

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        As an added bonus lots of chemicals and crap will be put into the environment.

        Yup this sounds productive to vandalize someone’s boat.

        • flow_off_a_cliff@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tell us you didn’t read the article without saying that. Plus even if they had used normal paint, that’s literally nothing compared to what this yacht does on a regular basis.

  • markr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good. Symbolic protests are a way to surface issues suppressed by the dominant ideology. If it gets any media coverage it is a success.

      • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, really. There are no ethically sound reasons for a person to have all this money when there is so much inequality. Moreover, there is no ethical ways to accumulate all this money. If you are billionaire either you or your daddy had to do a lot of explicitly unethical shit, and in order to retain it, you have to do unethical shit, actively, right now.

        • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Capitalism, no matter how benign, and well intended, is literally exploiting labor from those who are lesss fortunate. And thanks to that malignant leprechaun Milton Friedman, every MBA since thinks that they’re legally bound to maximize dividends for investors instead of compensating the people who do the actual production. It’s obscene, sociopathic, and literally evil. But if Jeebus didn’t want them to rich, they wouldn’t be, right?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Governments should stop billionaires. Tax them 100% income tax after a certain amount of income, tax them 50%% of their networth yearly after a certain amount of value.

      • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t think there ever was a time where not the richest were in power. From warlords to kings and now politicians in the pockets of CEO’s or shareholders by extension, people in power amass riches and with it more power.

  • ActionHank@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    100% agreed, billionaires should not exist. It’s absolutely disgusting that they do. They’ll take and take and take and take some more. If you haven’t seen it yet, please check out this site visualizing Jeff Bezos’ wealth. These people believe that they owe nothing to a society that gave them the tools, infra, security, and workforce for their companies to succeed. The level of excess is really unfathomable, and this chart is like Power of Ten for helping you understand the difference in a few zeros.

    https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    How dare these activists do anything other than overthrowing the government and instituting a socialist utopia. I just can’t support this.

  • tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    More mandatory overtime for her staff. She’ll never know it happened unless one of her social media managers sees it on Twitter and mentions it to her.

    • Kerred@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      And then they buy more red spray paint on Amazon because Walmart was out .

      Side note, didn’t the movie company make bank from people buying those V for Vendetta masks to protest against corporations or something? Vague memory of it

      • tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, between Anonymous and Occupy Wall Street those masks were very profitable for the people being protested against.

        I’m sure their brief and ultimately pointless unpopularity was well compensated for by those extra revenues.

    • Mamertine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what I don’t get.

      The owner of the yacht doesn’t give a shit. It’s beneath them.

      Those activists just made a headache for the working class crew who run the yacht.

      Good work sticking it to the man’s working class employees! /S

      • flow_off_a_cliff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They got their message on international news, and they did it targeting the super wealthy instead of blocking traffic or otherwise hindering innocent people. Frankly I don’t care if the crew has a ‘headache’ being paid to clean up some biodegradable paint, they’re just being paid for one task instead of another. What actual harm of any kind has this done? The benefit might be small but it’s nonzero unlike what most of us are doing.

        • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          they did it targeting the super wealthy instead of blocking traffic or otherwise hindering innocent people

          Reminds me that the point of protest is to be disruptive. Oh, you’re blocked on your way to do your job? Your job is to do your job, not to fight other workers on behalf of your employer

          I don’t get the whole ‘protest should not ever inconvenience anyone, ever’ line of thinking- if I’m travelling for work and I get stuck in traffic behind a protest, I bill my time and that’s how I pass the disruption signal along to where it needs to land

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re creating jobs by fucking up the yacht aren’t they?

        Or is it only billionaires that “create jobs” when they fuck up the entire world?

      • the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because targeted vandalism is easier and more satisfying to animalistic urges than the long work of organizing political backing, running for office, enacting societal change

  • Nepenthe@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    A spokesperson for Marina Port Vell said that the boat had not been damaged in Friday’s action. “After a quick action on behalf of the security team, the incident has been corrected and the boat is now in a perfect state,” the spokesperson told CNN.

    Cannot stress enough that a new paint job is not the kind of action that’s going to fix jack shit. More than likely, it’s barely an annoyance. Few people on the planet have not heard the message already. If you don’t want them joyriding a massive yacht everywhere, remove the yacht.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, while you’re entirely correct, someone on the team of “let’s harass the inconceivably wealthy” would probably still appreciate this action because it’s better than nothing.

      It’s also possible they’re trying to get the media to cover it more, rather than cause actual property damage

      • Nepenthe@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Uh. Lemme check. Yes. We’re well past the “please stop killing me, it’s really mean :(” stage. They know. They are choosing to jetset anyway.

        If the disgustingly rich haven’t shifted their focus by now, they’ve basically made their stance known already and stuff like this strikes me as just toying around. It makes activists feel like they accomplished something, and then it’s rectified quite literally the same day and everyone continues about their business.

        Wanna join in or would your parents worry?

        • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          So what have you done yourself? Stolen any boats?

          It’s too easy to sit and criticise other peoples protests from the comforting you gaming chair.

        • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Its self masturbatory. It makes themselves feel like they did something but grosses out most other people. These types of activist whose strategy is to do something shocking just to get press are always counter productive. As if they can’t reason how they’re speaking to the choir

    • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      And end up like Will Van Spronsen, who was called a terrorist and demonized by almost everyone for doing good. (Reddit would suspend your account just for mentioning him.)

      The super wealthy’s propaganda tools are more powerful than ours because they control the media, and there aren’t as many people who are awake to what’s happening as you might think. I’m all for direct action like what you describe, but we still need the red paint to make people aware of what’s going on. And I promise, it does do something. What do the unlovable rich want that they can’t buy? Love and respect. (Look at fucking Elon, that pathetic insect.)

      I recently read a sci-fi book called “Station Six” by an anarchist author who goes by S.J. Klapecki. Let me quote one of the characters:

      He wants to live like good King Arthur, loved and cherished and appreciated by his serfs. I like throwing a wrench into that. I think it’s important. And, who knows, maybe the next set of malcontents will learn something from us. I doubt it, but there’s my optimism for ya.

      You and I look at the activists pictured and think, “What was the point,” but the majority of people are still learning their ABCs of why this whole system is fucked. Sure, I’d have preferred the ship got destroyed completely, but these folks still did a brave act that has hit that sweet spot where it will get media attention without being entirely buried like a Will Van Spronsen (who, for the record, is a god damn hero and I’m not disparaging him at all).

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s quite a difference between destroying a yatch and trying to blow up a building with people in it…

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not sure whose disinformation campaign you’ve been hearing, but he set fire to unoccupied buses, not “trying to blow up a building with people in it”

          But I’m sure the fascists are happy someone from sh.itjust.works came along to defend them. What a shocker.

          Edit: What I should have said is “exhibit A” – This is why we still need the red paint, so thank you for illustrating my point