I’m sure they’ll come up with other reasons, but the kind of fundamental economic change he is trying to bring about takes a lot longer than 4 years. I think this will be one of their major selling points for Trump 2028.

If he lives that long, that is.

  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think he’ll just declare a national emergency on immigration or drugs or crime or something and suspend elections until it’s resolved. Which it never will be.

    The Dems and the courts will say he can’t do that. The supreme Court will rule 9-0 that he can’t do that and that he must have elections. And then he just will ignore everyone and elections won’t happen and nobody will do anything

    • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Elections in the US are run by state governments, so in a situation where the White House declares there will be no presidential election, things would be a lot messier. A number of states will hold elections anyway, while a couple particularly loyal MAGA state governments might actually cancel them. This also complicates things in terms of state governments. A lot of states hold municipal / county / state elections on the same ballot as the federal elections (while others hold them on off-years as a deliberate method to depress turnout).

      In practice what we would likely see is a rump election, which the Democrats take very seriously, in an effort to elect Rahm Emanuel or some comparable slime mold as the US president in exile or some shit. The situation would call for for a military coup, if not an outright revolution, but they will still do everything in their power to observe the procedures and work within the institutions, because that is the only arena where they have ever had any real power. They will never concede that the situation demands a popular uprising or military force, because that leaves them completely outside of the driver’s seat. Nobody is going to take orders from them. When the bullets start flying, nobody is taking up arms to restore the US republic to 2016 so we can hand the reigns back to the Clintons and the Bushes.

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve been fixated on the GOP justices simply ruling he can run for a third term. But your scenario is also plausible. As a bonus - it’s really funny. I can imagine dem pols 10,000s of times saying “He cannot do this!” But they don’t actually do a thing to stop him.

    • Lussy [any, hy/hym]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I think he’ll just declare a national emergency on immigration or drugs or crime or something and suspend elections until it’s resolved.

      The nytimes will post an equivocating infographic about the advantages and disadvantages of tackling drugs and crime

    • Sulv [he/him, undecided]@hexbear.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah that sounds like a pretty realistic way they’ll execute it.

      I guess I’m more talking about convincing popular support, the excuses talking heads will give “moderates” to convince them it’s a good idea.