I’ve started seeing various stories of people in the media speaking out in support of Palestine and being swiftly fired. I’m very curious if the current state of propaganda is going to increase the chance of people working in non-public facing jobs of also being fired and branded anti-Semitic. I’m scared of this coming up in the workplace because I don’t think I’d be able to keep my mouth shut and I could absolutely see certain people starting shit.

  • Bnova [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    My main coworker who I interact with the most is a half Chinese half Palestinian leftist so it’s pretty rare for us not to be shouting about Zionist or Westerners getting what they deserve.

  • SexMachineStalin [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Probably very high. I overheard some boxes of saltine crackers talking about it in Estonian, with the usual Redditbrain talking points (minus the overt pro-apartheid) coping about how Hamas is solely at fault, sabotaged a peace deal, war crime, etc.

    Of course I can’t say anything because I’m this one guy from South Africa who constantly wears a keffiyeh and is capable of material/historic analysis. Hell, HR already looks at me with suspicion for “harbouring anti-NATO views”.

    :estonia-cool:

  • flan [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    i wouldnt be surprised if this is happening. Personally I’m going to keep my mouth shut in places where i’m not anonymous because losing my job right now would be pretty bad.

    • sempersigh [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      People have short emotional memory with this stuff. This is how it was with Ukraine in 2022 you were the most toxic person in the room if you said anything bad about Ukraine. Now something like(give or take?) 46 percent of democrats oppose sending weapons to Ukraine.

      We’re in an extreme flashpoint; wait for the war to normalize in people’s heads and use this time to monitor the situation; read up on history and have your takes ready for the future. People are going to be freaking out for awhile now in a flashpoint like this.

  • RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    High, and honestly unless you are a high profile politician or journalist, would you really achieve anything arguing with your libs coworkers eager to rat you so you stop talking about unionizing?

    Yes, I know the Mao quote, don’t need to repeat me I’m a liberal

    • eXAt [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I understand the point of the Mao quote but I’m gonna be honest my social life has drastically improved since I stopped being so “zealous”

  • centof@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would just limit myself to stick with fact.

    From 2000-2022, The death toll for the conflict was ~10.5k Palestinians vs ~1k Isrealis. https://israelpalestinetimeline.org/charts/

    Considering this fact, it is not surprising some Palestinians are willing to go to extreme measures to get revenge.

    • GeorgeZBush [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thing is this won’t work on most people. They’ll see those numbers and be like “well they’re terrorists, and also Hamas uses human shields.” They will always find a way to justify Israel.

      • CthulhusIntern [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Damn, Hamas must be pretty dumb then, continuing to use that tactic, even after the IDF has repeatedly demonstrated willingness to shoot through them without hesitation.”

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

            The “nonfalsifiable orthodoxy” bit in particular. Point out to them that they (and the media they read) are “transform[ing] any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence.”

      • centof@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe not, people can only see the truth of the matter if they want to. If their worldview requires it to be a conflict of good vs evil, than they probably will ignore it to perserve their worldview.

        well they’re terrorists, and also Hamas uses human shields.

        My reply would be that they are also people who see themselves as in a shitty situation.

        They will always find a way to justify Israel.

        That is very likely true, but you don’t know until you actually bring up the issue with them.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considering this fact, it is not surprising some Palestinians are willing to go to extreme measures to get revenge.

      Or perhaps that they are exceedingly desperate to gain ground

  • itsPina [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Depends where you live. Amerikkka it’s probably not a safe bet to talk about this stuff openly. 35/50 US states have “anti-bds” laws meaning you can be fired for protesting Israel, even cooler you can’t be hired as a state employee if you protest Israel. Muh first amendment tho

  • Lerios [hy/hym]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    yesterday my dad called and brought up the current situation in palestine - not to talk about palestine, but specifically to tell me not to mention it (or any of my beliefs) at my new job. shits fucked.