• gingerbrat [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    3 days ago

    “It all comes down to who controls the Strait of Hormuz,” Dalio wrote in a lengthy post on X. If Iran retains the ability to control or even negotiate over who passes through the strait—through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil supply flows daily—Dalio argues the U.S. will be seen as having lost the war, regardless of how the conflict is resolved. Dalio compared a potential U.S. failure at Hormuz to Britain’s humiliation during the 1956 Suez Crisis, a moment widely regarded by historians as the end of the British Empire’s global imperialism.

    timmy-pray

    • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      iran should change the official english name of the straits to “presinald trunt’s greatest failure” as a joke

  • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    The comparison to the suez crisis is very compelling, but also like… that was the UK and France, who were being pressured by the US and USSR to pull out. This invasion is being lead by the US, which has no larger superpower looming behind it to pressure it to leave, so ALL of the onus is on Iran to actually win.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think, in this case, the pressure will be economic. As US allies in Europe and Asia start crashing, that’s going necessarily drag the US down as well. The war is incredibly unpopular domestically, and if it leads to a big recession then there’s going to be a pressure from domestic capitalists to wind the war down.