• Eddbopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This is fascinating, this rock that hurtals threw the black void of space for billions of years, and here it is. Photographed. If we can get here, we can go anywhere.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Voyager could reach Proxima Centauri in about 75000 years at the current speed (if it was aimed at it).

      The biology, sociology and physics of interstellar travel are brutal and unforgiving.

      • iglou@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yes, but as long as we don’t self-destroy, I’m pretty certain we’ll master it. The achievements of humanity are already remarkable. I mean, being able to split atoms and safely harness the produced energy is pretty incredible. Fusion, which seems impossible in many aspects, is closer and closer to our grasp every day. I am convinced that interstellar travel in a reasonable time for humans will be achieved eventually. But of course not in our lifetime, far from it.

        • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The problem is it is a hard, physical limit imposed by spacetime itself. No matter the source the energy required to go even a fraction of the speed of light is beyond belief.

          • iglou@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Disclaimer: I’m nowhere close to being a professional in the field. If you are or simply know more than I do, please correct me.

            But interstellar travel doesn’t have to be based on higher speed, just like we didn’t expand our energy production by mining and burning coal faster. We found ways that produce much, much more energy in the same time without needing to keep improving our fuel production. Why wouldn’t we be able to find ways to travel much, much further in the same time without improving our speed?

            We know spacetime can theoretically be manipulated: anything with a mass does to some extent. Why wouldn’t we be able to harness that someday?

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Not quite anywhere. The rocket equation is a bitch that way. Nor does the hardware live forever, or even us.

      • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Space isnt quite empty either. There maybe extremely few particles in space, but its more than zero. Spacecraft will slow down and stop eventually. It just takes a long time.

  • Naz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I think the primary reason there’s so much psychological revulsion in this thread is because the only times you see something like this on Earth is in deep cave footage

    And typically these types of ecological niches are completely filled with insects

    Evolution primes the brain to pay attention to threats

    No insects? They’re hiding. —> Dread/Fear

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It is a very safe place, as all people are extremely far away.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Have you ever thought about what it must be like in space? That shit is scary. We take for granted that we have an atmosphere to disperse light, as well as a ground for light to reflect off of. In space, some shit could be right in front of you and you would have no idea. If there were an asteroid between you and the sun, you wouldn’t realize until it was so close that there was a huge black spot covering the sun up.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Perhaps because you can see mountains at the same scale that allows you to clearly see the object’s horizon/curvature. It would be like if Earth had mountains thousands of miles high. It’s a landscape that feels deeply unnatural.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It would have been cool if they had named the spacecraft Urashima since they were going to Ryugu, but I guess it wouldn’t make sense because in the story, the gift Urashima brings back from Ryugu ends up fucking him over. At least, that’s how I understood it as a kid.

  • Thorry@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    2 days ago

    Scientists: Yes, we finally did it! We captured a picture from our probe that touched down on a big rock in space! We are awesome!

    Me: Holy shit! That is so cool, you are awesome! What did the rock look like?

    Scientists: Like a big fucking rock

    Me: Dude, no way!

        • DokPsy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Cries in astrophotographer in the suburbs who’s had one cloudless night in a fortnight

          • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Every time I have no clouds here it’s the moon, like ok yes moon I do enjoy taking pictures of you but can you disappear a bit more?

            • DokPsy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              I had a few glorious dark (for bortle 5-6) nights and was able to get a lot of nice eagle nebula shots a month or so ago. I’m constantly battling the hippie ‘don’t cut down the few old trees left in this suburb’ part of me with the ‘get your leaves and branches out of my damn shot, I’m trying to capture space’ part

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not sure why but this fills me with such inconsolable dread. Something about a dead cold rock floating through such vast nothingness.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, no, no. It actually isn’t lifeless. It contains some small microbes that are virtually undetectable. Their only effect on the human psyche is to create paranoia, delusions of grandeur, and remove all traces of empathy.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      It kind of reminds me of the comet from Outer Wilds, which was kinda spooky, in terms of having to land on this tiny object traveling very fast through space and navigate it

    • Joeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, and knowing the only reason you can see it is because of the lighting from the robot taking the photo. Otherwise it’s just this thing shrouded in darkness flying through space at whatever ridiculously fast speed only to eventually run into something.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      This image is ripe for an SCP to be written up based on it.

      Imagine being one of the first humans to try to mine one of these, and you feel like you saw something moving in the corner of your eye, just where the light meets the shadow of one of the sharp lumps, but you can’t be sure.

  • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    2 days ago

    With pictures like this it’s so hard to convince my brain that it’s not just a picture of a random boulder taken with flash at night.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I worked on Landsat 9 a few years ago, and when I got on-console for my first shift after it launched, I remembered seeing the telemetry come down and thinking, huh, doesn’t look any different than when we simulated the data…how do I know we actually sent it up there?

      Then something went wrong that i had to fix and I snapped back to reality.

    • BigBrownDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was looking at pictures of Mars’ surface from Curiosity with my uncle who is a lunar landing and science denier. He said, “That could be taken at any desert on Earth.” I was like NO SHIT! You mean to tell me that other planets have rocks too?!?! No fucking way! What do you expect it to look like?

      You and your 6th grade reading level somehow outsmarted two generations of NASA scientists and their massive coverup and lies about space exploration? No, you fucking dunce.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, you’re not wrong.

      Except this specific boulder isn’t stuck in earth’s gravity well, it’s got its own thing going on.

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      When you think about it, that’s kinda exactly what it is. Which is very cool :-D

      Just a big random boulder in space amongst a whole solar system of random boulders, taken with a light for illumination because it’s dark, yo

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are barely visible tiny features that would have eroded away on Earth.

      That said, they are barely visible and tiny. If somebody said it’s just some weird concretion, I’d completely believe it.

    • ShadowRam@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s absolutely no sense of scale here.

      What we see as rocks, could absolutely be boulders…

      We’d tend to error of the side of ‘small’ but with no fluid (liquid or air) erosion, these could be massive.

  • PushButton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m just thinking about all the technical challenges to land a flying metal cereal box on a moving asteroid…

    Man, this rocks.

    • DokPsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It just took a collection of bombs and careful aiming. We as a species are really good at throwing things pretty accurately and at messing with controlling fire

      I kid, it’s awesome we were able to make it happen and the wealth of knowledge gained by doing it