lord-bezos-amused

  • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 months ago

    Alright so we go back to throwing bricks through CEO house windows at best and dragging their hook asses out into the street at worst

  • adultswim_antifa [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The courts determine what every agency has authority to do now that Chevron is gone, and they’re always going to take the capitalist side, especially since so many judges are blatantly taking gifts, so the next few decades are probably going to be pretty fucked up.

    • jackmarxist [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Honestly I didn’t know that random courts can do stuff like this in the US. Can’t Joe Biden sign some executive order or something?

      • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Joe Biden can punt a child across the white house lawn without consequence. He will simply shrug and call for the courts to be democratic and urge billionaires to pay their fair share of taxes. The end.

      • Chronicon [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        as usual rather than passing anything in gridlocksville (congress) dems just have an agency of the executive branch issue a rule leaving it open to all kinds of easy legal challenges. So they can say “we tried”

      • StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Biden can challenge this to higher level courts, but since they are also under Republican control they are probably going to tell him to pound sand.

        An executive order probably wouldn’t do anything (they’d rule it out too)

      • Dessa [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Even if they couldnt before, the Supreme Court recentlt ruled that courts get the final call over executive branch stuff. Things are unbelievably fucked over here

      • footfaults [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think the executive order would instruct the FTC to enforce their decision on non competes. The problem is that the courts as @Dessa has said the courts are now pushing back against the administrative state with recent decisions that overturned Chevron

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    Texas so I’m guessing it’s the Republican 5th circuit rubber stamp discount shop… As usual these fucks give the oligarchs what they want.

    Since they’re claiming the FTC doesn’t have the right to do this I’m wondering if the supreme rubber stamp courts decision removing Chevron Deference has something to do with it…

  • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh my fucking god I think Texas might need to straight up not have courts for a few years. They’ve proven they can’t be trusted with a court if they’re gonna keep doing this shit

    Non-compete agreements are basically never upheld in court anyway! 99% of them are already illegal! This was just going to make everyone’s lives easier, including most companies!