• barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    With modern missile tech is there even any reason to put nuclear missiles in Taiwan? I was under the impression that ICBMs have basically made that pointless. Oh no, the targets will live for 5-10 whole minutes longer during the travel time.

        • REgon [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I don’t think the US has capacity to make hypersonic missiles though, so that would require the arms manufacturers to actually do some research and improve manufaturing

          • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Hmm, you’re right, and that wouldn’t be very profitable. Perhaps they should see if they can buy the technology from China! i-love-not-thinking

    • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      It kinda matters in that there’s a chain of command before you can retaliate. Someone has to see the missiles, make sure it’s not a malfunction, tell their boss who tells their boss, etc. Ideally your missiles land before the counterattack starts. This is why deploying missiles in eastern Europe was such a big deal to Putin as well.