example of the lands lost due to the dawes act

The Dawes Act of 1887 was a post-Indian Wars law that illegally dissolved 90 million acres of Native lands from 1887 to 1934. Signed into law by President Grover Cleveland on February 8, 1887, the Dawes Act expedited the cultural genocide of Native Americans. The negative effects of the Dawes Act on Indigenous tribes would result in the enactment of the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, the so-called “Indian New Deal.”

It authorized the U.S. to divide indigenous tribal land into allotments for heads of families and individuals, leading to a loss of 2/3rds of land (~100 million acres) over the next 50 years.

The law converted traditional systems of land tenure into a state-imposed system of private property by forcing Native Americans to “assume a capitalist and proprietary relationship with property” that did not previously exist in their cultures, according to historian Kent Blansett. The act declared remaining lands after allotment as “surplus” and available for sale, including to non-Natives.

Between 1887 and 1934, indigenous people lost control of about 100 million acres of land, or about two-thirds of the land base they held in 1887, as a result of the act.

The loss of land and the break-up of traditional leadership of tribes had such devastating consequences that many scholars refer to the Dawes Act as one of the most destructive U.S. policies for indigenous people in history.

Hexbear links

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • homhom9000 [she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
    26·
    3 months ago

    I have friends in the impacted gov divisions being targeted by doge. They’re worried about their career and asked for advice. They didn’t like when I said fight back though.

  • DeathToBritain [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    24·
    3 months ago

    for like a year I have tried to convince my wife we should get a cassowary. THINK ABOUT IT THO IT’D BE SICK. it’s literally the most deadly living dinosaur. and also I have a special interest in birds so it’s actually ableist if she won’t let me get a cassowary

  • Eco [she/her, he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    22·
    2 months ago

    hiring managers just don’t understand when you have a gap in your resume. it’s not my fault i was stranded in the sierra nevada mountains in winter along with the rest of my party, and we eventually had to resort to cannibalism to survive

  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    21·
    3 months ago

    catgirl-flop witness me only get 3 hours of sleep and work a 10 hour day of delivering cases of 9.5pH bottled water to single digit millionaires in sporadic rain

    e: lol please disregard. Hours cut again desolate

    • TerminalEncounter [she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
      8·
      3 months ago

      I had to explain to a doctor what the deal with alkaline water was. She didn’t know why the patient was doing that, because there’s no actual scientific basis at all. That was a fun convo, plus she was the prettiest fucking person I had ever spoken to

  • Wheaties [she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
    21·
    3 months ago

    Between DOGE and the tariffs, Felix described this second term as the US doing shock-doctrine to itself.

    it’s a good observation, and i’m a little mad i didn’t think of it myself

  • rhubarb [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    20·
    3 months ago

    Since the new Monster Hunter lets you choose if the cats speak your language or just meow, they should go all the way with it and give me the option to have the cats speak Italian

  • Parsani [love/loves, comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    20·
    3 months ago

    Sometimes when I read some cutting edge theory or whatever from some academic, I can’t help but think three things: this is just Marxism with out the understanding of the logic of capital and without the radical conclusions, no westerner can see in front of their own nose (I.e. No internationalism, poor understanding of global exploitation even when they need to note Marx failed to consider race, they fail to see anyone outside the Imperial core), and this is just Deleuze and Guattari in slightly different words.

    And at no point is there any discussion of mass politics, just distributed points of organization which somehow(???) supplant the military death cult of capital. It’s “All the Power to the Soviets”, but there are no coherent Soviets for the power to be excersized.

    Liberals just want to brunch and for the cab driver and waiter not be mean to them when they tip poorly. Where the banannas on the breakfast platter came from doesn’t matter, but they should be affordable for me.

    Unless people shed their petite bourgeois aspirations, so much of this work is just fucking useless. I should make a rule that I won’t read anyone’s work who hasn’t done political organizing. Why were Marx and Engels, and Rosa, and Kollontai, so interesting? Because they weren’t academics, because the words they wrote had meaning in action, not just for pontificating.

    • Parsani [love/loves, comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
      13·
      3 months ago

      And to extend the rant. Where the fuck are these writers now? Are they putting fucking anything at stake? Tenured profs have more job stability than a lifetime Congress ghoul. So what do they do? They write a fucking oped in some liberal magazine about taking the high road or about the “need to ask questions” about how we want society to be. MOTHER FUCKERS, there are groypers in the white house dreaming up anti-trans laws and how to reify patriarchy, warping the nightmare world they dream of into existence. A fucking oped isn’t even worth the fucking pixels it’s displayed on at this point.

    • Cimbazarov [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
      9·
      3 months ago

      Because they weren’t academics, because the words they wrote had meaning in action, not just for pontificating.

      When I started reading alot more books, I picked up on a difference between the people who had interesting life experiences and put it into their writing and people who were mostly shut ins and I found the former much more coherent and interesting. For philosophy this was really obvious but I could even see it in fiction.

      I don’t want to say absolutely that people who only write have nothing interesting to say and can’t make good observations or analysis, but its pretty rare imo. However I do tend to use it as a rule of thumb if a book/author is worth picking up or not.

  • buh [she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
    20·
    3 months ago

    it feels weird to have roots in a country where your mom only moved to amerikkka to avoid the oppression from a fascist dictatorship, but your dad moved to amerikkka because he happened to have enough money and connections from working for that same fascist dictatorship

  • Cimbazarov [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
    19·
    3 months ago

    I was shocked today to see a coworker quoting Mao. I’m 100% sure they are not socialist and are probably misinterpreting the quote.

    The quote was: “There is great chaos under heaven, the situation is excellent”

    He was trying to use it as a way of coping with how the company is going through layoffs – which is insane to me. Digging for the source of that quote, apparently it might not be a real quote and is something misattributed to Mao in a letter he wrote during the cultural revolution. Digging even more for the source of who attributed it to Mao, it comes from some anti-conmunist text.

    Not something you see everyday in the good ol’ United States of capitalism what-the-hell

    Edit: even better, he says that’s what he tells people when they ask for advice on succeeding in the company what-the-hell

    • Speaker [e/em/eir]@hexbear.netEnglish
      14·
      3 months ago

      If he didn’t say it, I will continue to pretend he did because that shit is fire. I definitely say that at work a lot, along with “let a thousand flowers bloom”.

      • Cimbazarov [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
        7·
        3 months ago

        Found this

        According to Roderick MacFarquhar and Michael Schoenhals’ book Mao’s Last Revolution, Mao expressed his determination to create “great disorder under heaven” for the purpose of ultimately achieving,“great order under heaven.”