• Mike@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    This is getting so sad and pathetic that it’s getting really funny 😅

  • versionc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    I used to enjoy AI a lot, and I still think the technology is really cool, but lately I’m beginning to despise it. It spreads and nestles itself into every corner of our life, and it rots whatever it touches, be it the humans that rely on it or the projects in which it’s used. I see so many open source projects that are tainted with it, it’s almost impossible to avoid it. It’s sad. The generations that will grow up with AI will be fucked.

    • iglou@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The generations that will grow up with AI will be fucked.

      Eh. That’s something every single generation before us in at least the past 150 years has been saying about other new society-changing stuff. They’ll be fine, society just changes.

      Generations that will grow up with social media will be fucked.

      Generations that will grow up with internet will be fucked.

      Generations that will grow up with video games will be fucked.

      Generations that will grow up with computers will be fucked.

      Generations that will grow up with morning-after pills will be fucked.

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        And at least the first two were right.

        Social media without limit has caused a whole slew of issues that are still being studied. And, while the early days of the internet were great, ever since at least the late 2010s, it’s been largely downhill.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Probably more like, generations growing up with unchecked capitalism will be slowly fucked over time to the point where you won’t recognise life in several generations.

      • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        17 hours ago

        What about Cambridge Analytica, the mental health impacts, the addiction, … we’re still learning the social impact of social media — especially capitalistic social media. To pretend we aren’t is just plain ignorant, no? You can’t say people are fine when you don’t even know how they’ve been affected.

        • iglou@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’m not saying everything is lovely and we are at the peak of civilization. I’m saying that every form of progress comes with challenges and downsides, and this saying of “Next generation will be fucked” is a cognitive bias every generation has had for a pretty long time.

          They also have positive sides.

          I don’t know if I expressed myself that poorly (I was pretty tired after all), but I did not mean at all that there are no downsides to any of these. I meant that despite these sayings, every generation so far has ended up as fine as the previous ones.

      • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yeah, sorry but I have to disagree with you pretty hard there. Generations that grew up with social media, internet, video games, … they are fucked. We’ve been watching the fuckening for a long time now. Saying that they haven’t been fucked is reminiscent of my grandparents saying ADHD and Anxiety aren’t real.

        • iglou@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Are they really more fucked than generations who didn’t have access to social media, internet, and video games? It seems to me that you are biased by the negative effects these had, and ignoring the positive ones.

          Saying that they haven’t been fucked is reminiscent of my grandparents saying ADHD and Anxiety aren’t real.

          How is that in any way comparable? I’m not saying the downsides of social media, internet, video games are not real, I’m saying “People growing up with X will be fucked” is a saying that every generation has been saying, ignoring the positive impacts. This is a cognitive bias in the likes of the rosy retrospection.

          • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I don’t think so. First off, all the examples mentioned were computers, social media, video games, … these are all still pretty darn novel in the grand scheme of things. We still don’t know what happens to a society that doesn’t need to contend with boredom because they have algorithmically optimized content feeds jacking up their prefrontal cortex at all times of day and night. We still don’t understand the full extent to which walled garden social media ecosystems can influence politics and cultural bias, detriment democratic processes, or empower individuals. We still aren’t taking privacy seriously as a society, having relied for hundreds of years on the fact that complete and total surveillance systems is infeasible for a government. It’s far too early to say whether anyone is or isn’t fucked by any of this, which is why I draw comparisons to grandmama saying “back in my day, the boy was just excited. He didn’t have ‘ADHD.’ He was fine.” It’s about ignorance when new information comes to light.

            We have a lot of reason to believe there is some serious consequences to technology that unfortunately isn’t obvious from the get go. More unfortunately, we have a culture of not caring. Innovation first, policy second, right? Except that only works while policy can still catch up. We’ve been slow walking into a situation where, yeah, one of these generations is definitely getting fucked. Probably, though, it’s each generation getting a little more fucked as we continue having them.

            I’m not ignoring the benefits. The benefits are part of how we justify not impeding the innovation process — it’s literally part of the problem. The root of the issue is that we ignore the consequences, pretend that’s just the way things are, and think in weird metaphors like “the market will self correct” and “the market is never wrong.” If the future generations aren’t fucked, it’ll be because they solved the problems that were created here. It won’t be “they weren’t fucked because they were never fucked.” No, they were fucked. Hopefully they figure it out.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Funny you say that. In ways not everyone (obviously) sees, each generation was right about that.

        • iglou@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          No. Each generation was fucked in their own way, regardless of the two edges of the progress that they grew up with.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    OpenCode with Playwright gives you full control over what model you use, the prompts, and what it integrates with, and it promotes open weight models. The way Firefox implements this seems gimmicky, and I don’t like that it persistently collects your info while browsing. Also fuck OpenAI.

  • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Seeing AI invade open source is sad. AI slop contributions. AI integration that no one asked for.

    For now Firefox derivatives are fine (I use LibreWolf), but many of those derivatives don’t work on macOS because it “fails to verify that this executable is actually executable” (what does that actually mean?????????).

    I had hopes for Ladybird Browser but now it’s being vibe coded (rewritten in rust by ai for no reason whatsoever), and it’s not ready yet anyway. Now I’m hopeful for Servo engine. It’s in development but at some point it will be ready, and it bans slop contributions.

    • suckdings@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      For now Firefox derivatives are fine (I use LibreWolf), but many of those derivatives don’t work on macOS because it “fails to verify that this executable is actually executable” (what does that actually mean???)

      Not sure if this is what you’re experiencing, but it’s a common thing. Happens to me too, I have to run a command after I update from Homebrew.

      LibreWolf FAQ: why is LibreWolf marked as broken?

      It is possible that Apple Silicon users see their recently downloaded LibreWolf flagged as broken or unsafe by the OS.

      This happens because we do not notarize the macOS version of the browser: we don’t have a paid Apple Developer license and we don’t want to support this signing mechanism that is put behind a paywall without providing significant gains.

      You can remove the quarantine attribute from the Application using this command:

      xattr -dr com.apple.quarantine /Applications/LibreWolf.app
      
  • tackleberry
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    You should see how AI is being deployed in warfare. Plausible deniability is about to go through the roof.

    Back in the day, you get out jail free card was on a scale of “the devil made me do it” to “I was following orders”, now we get “It was AI”

  • arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Do yourself a favour and use LibreWolf or WaterFox instead.

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Or just keep using Firefox and don’t use the entirely optional and opt-in features you don’t need. The same as always.

      I’m completely flabbergasted why people get their panties in a twist over

      • completely local features that happen to be backed by machine learning models (the translation feature is a huge privacy win over sending your text to Google translate)
      • opt-in LLM integration that nobody forces you to use
    • ken@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Or further favourable: Konform Browser.

      Tor Browser and Mullvad Browser also worthy mentions.

  • TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Most pointed questions you type will start a Google search1. This loads a regular search results page, and sees Firefox’s AI chatbot shift to a sidebar on the right. The AI reads the top results (including any AI overview), and produces a response based on them.

    AI reads AI reading AI reading AI reading AI reading…

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      …and we’ll all suffer as climate change increases. None of this shit is worth frying for.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Donald Trump is the most environmentalist president ever. With oil prices as they are, can you imagine how much less oil we’re burning?

          • athatet@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            lol no. We still burn the same amount only now the robber baron oil execs get paid triple.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Poor people get priced out of driving. If you can’t afford gas money you may not take a trip over the weekend

        • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Nah, it’s just imperialist billiards, big vs little.

          It’s all part of “the great game” the west has been playing against Russia in the middle east for over a century… The middle east is where America does it’s proxy wars.

          World wars are only a risk if a white western European country is attacked. Horrendous how those in power see the world, isn’t it?

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      thier revenue entirely dependent on google, you can see why, they got lazy and dint spend time developing thier browser.

  • DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 days ago

    So sad for Firefox. I try to keep using since it’s the only solution free of Chromium, but I guess chromium will control everything only Safari will not be chromium.

      • DeckPacker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ladybird is pretty much dead to me, firstly because the dev has some really bad right wing vibes (he said gender inclusive language is too political for his docs and retweeted a Nazi on Twitter). And secondly because the started using AI to move the code to Rust to make it more secure, which is insane if you know anything about AI or security.

        My current hope is in servo, because they have much more capable maintainers and the project seems to make some good progress. Also they have daily builds on their website for every operating system, so you can already try it out easily (but don’t expect everything to work right now, they still need some time).

        • ATPA9@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          I tried out the servo alpha on android and it is surprisingly usable for something so early in development

        • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Seems like the goal of Servo is to be used for embedded applications rather than as a full fledged browser. Is the idea that someone else will build a full browser on top of servo?

        • potustheplant@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          I did not know about the AI stuff. However, I do think that the “inclusion” controversy is way overblown. Why in the world would you need to have “gender inclusive language” in the docs for a browser engine?

          • blind3rdeye@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            That ladybird gender thing is such a load of crap. I find it hard to even believe that people are genuinely passionate about it. Every time ladybird is mentioned, someone brings up the ‘extreme views’ based on this. But it is the biggest load of nothing you are ever likely to see.

            For anyone who doesn’t know, here’s what happened:

            • The build documentation for this unreleased pre-beta software used the pronoun ‘he’.
            • Someone suggested that they change it to be more inclusive.
            • The author didn’t think it was important enough to change, so left it.
            • More requests and pressure came to change the pronoun.
            • The pronoun was then changed, and the author apologised.

            To me, that’s a minor error of judgement, with no lasting harm caused to anyone at all. But yet somehow this is constantly used as a reason to avoid ladybird.


            How can I take this seriously? Is this some kind of organised anti-competition propaganda campaign? We’re talking about a free and open source project of a highly technical nature, and somehow people are upset that the word ‘he’ existed temporarily in a work-in-progress document with a target audience of essentially zero people. The people making this project are not political leaders or public figures with media training. They are focused on the technical side of things. Yeah, the pronoun was a mistake, but it pretty much the smallest mistake you could possibly make in this context. It not like they are donating to right-wing orgs, or publicly denouncing anyone, or promoting hate. I see far worse than what they did on a daily basis from all sorts of people - including right here in lemmy. And in terms of ladybird, I have not heard of any kind of misstep ever since this instant - which was a very long time ago now. It is honestly bizarre that people have clung onto this incident. I’m honestly not sure I believe that the backlash is entirely organic. It’s just too disproportionate.

            [edit] Let me just follow this by saying that I do think there are other good reasons to be upset with this same ladybird dev. I just don’t think the ‘he’ in the docs thing is anything at all.

            • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              For anyone who doesn’t know, here’s what happened:

              except you forgot to mention some fucking crucial steps, like harshly calling it as politics and sending everyone to a warmer climate, and locking the issue to prevent further discussion

            • cepelinas@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 day ago

              Could it be posibble the authors first language is gendered, because this sounds like something I would say in Lithuanian like when I talk about computers I use he because the word has a male gender.

          • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Or we could ask the question in the opposite direction - why would you use language which excluded anybody who doesn’t identify as male from the documentation for an open-source project, to the point where when someone offers to update the language for you your response is to rant about “personal politics” and write a contribution policy which forbids the use of gender-neutral language?

            • potustheplant@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Apparently Kling was against using “they” instead of “he”. While I do agree that it’s wrong and gender neutral terms should be used, I wouldn’t “cancel” the guy over it. Afaik they are using gender neutral terms now.

              The other stuff about Kling mentioned at the bottom of your link is worrying though. It’s a shame a project as important and necessary as Ladybird was created by a person like him :(

            • Zetta@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              Good thing it’s an open source project so it doesn’t really matter at all what you think of someone working on it imo

        • Zetta@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ladybird is gonna be awesome, you are overblowing things, it’s an open source project chill out. Also sevro is not currently really being designed as a desktop web browser. Its a web engine for light weight embedded applications. Ladybird is currently the only in development webbrowser that is primarily designed with desktop main browser use as its intended use.

          And I know you aren’t a fan but in the next 5 years pretty much every piece of software you touch will have code from an LLM in it, so get over it or stop using software.

        • B3rn4yy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          28
          ·
          1 day ago

          I won’t use < insert FOSS Project > because of political vibes.

          I see this shit almost everyday. Absolute npc behaviour.

          • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            NPC behavior is not having any sense of morality and the backbone to take a stand, but I get it, it’s far more comfortable to just put your head in the sand and consume

            • B3rn4yy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Consume what exactly in this context?

              Also you self righteous people still didn’t tell me why you won’t use the browser expect for vibes so I don’t really feel bad for “consuming”

              • Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Also you self righteous people still didn’t tell me why you won’t use the browser expect for vibes so I don’t really feel bad for “consuming”

                and like flies to shit the conservative comes out of the wood works right on queue to bitch about politics.

          • Zetta@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yea I just don’t get it for open source software, like you aren’t supporting their agenda by using the free fucking software

              • B3rn4yy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                True lmao xD

                Man I sure do love identity politics and having software and tech in general be somehow associated with political movements. I don’t give fuck about this shit.

                • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Everything is political

                  And FOSS is explicitly political. It’s open-source free software. What do you think it is? It doesn’t exist in a vacuum

      • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ladybird is being rewritten in Rust by AI for no reason whatsoever. Browsers should be secure, and vibe coding prevents security.

        Currently I am hopeful for Servo. Its development is not as far along, but it seems way saner. It bans AI contribution, and it’s intended to be very performant.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Relevant section:

    Smart Window uses ‘memories’, things Mozilla says “…it learns from your activity” to inform its responses.

    You can delete memories individually, and you can set any given chat session to not use/store them.

    Fine so far.

    The problem? My memory list isn’t populated with things Smart Window learned since I enabled it. Oh no.

    It has activity going back months. We’re talking searches and website interactions from long before I enabled this. features.

    Firefox just handed that history to the AI models to plough from, without telling me upfront.

    I found this the creepiest aspect of Smart Window.

    Mozilla says this was a flub; it will refine the onboarding around Smart Window to limit memory formation to post-opt-in activity only. That’s obviously the right fix.

    Because sharing a user’s prior browsing history with third-party AI models, silently, on feature activation, without any headset? Yeah, a bit icky – but that’s the price of testing features that are finished, I guess.

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m willing to give them a pass since this was a development build and while someone probably should’ve thought of it, it’s the kind of bug that can happen. If this was the public release it would be a lot more outrageous.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Finding out about this gives me some extra questions, though.

        • Was this data summarized on enabling this window, or before?
        • Did it use an existing model, or re-use one that someone may have already downloaded for a different feature?
        • Is this activity going anywhere else, like Mozilla’s recent “privacy-preserving” advertising?
        • When this does release, what will the default be?
    • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s also an option to bring your own LLM, with fields for model name, endpoint, and API token available for entry when the manual option is enabled. However, the page itself warns local models may not work correctly.

      It looks like there’s an option for people to self-host too. You won’t have to send your history to someone else’s computer.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If it’s anything like how they handled the AI sidebar, this option is going to get hidden before it hits production.

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Hey, I’m not excited about more stuff getting added into an already overflowing Firefox (why not an extension?!), but if they must promote AI choice, I’m with you: actually allow user choice.

            (Based on how Mozilla has added two unrequested search engines while ignoring a request to add StartPage, the “choice” thing seems to boil down to backroom deals.)

  • TDCN@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    F*** I really dont want to change away from Firefox. Pleas be good Firefox. Please! Don’t F this up.

    • Godort@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      115
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Librewolf is exactly the same browser with all the security features dialed to 11 and all the AI removed.

        • eleijeep@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          And it breaks sooo many sites.

          No it doesn’t. I use Librewolf and this common refrain is FUD.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            29 minutes ago

            I used it for almost a year.
            It took me ~2 months to find, understand, and tweak settings until I stopped running into issues with sites at least one every couple weeks.

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          2 days ago

          I tried Librewolf for a while and found it to be a bit too much for me when all I really want is Firefox without AI. The privacy options are probably great but not for me.

          Just installed waterfox. First impression is that I am super happy to be bock to the previous Firefox theme - it takes less space and looks nicer in my opinion. Seems promising. Thanks for the recommendation! :)

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            The latest Firefox release added a button that does exactly what you want. Turns off AI everywhere.

            • cabbage@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah, I returned to FireFox after the latest release because of the kill switch. Still I’m uncomfortable with using software that’s full of stuff that I hate, even if it’s disabled. This is not really rational I guess, just me being weird.

              • tyler@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                22 hours ago

                It’s difficult. If people don’t support Firefox then the downstream browsers that everyone in this thread are suggesting are fucked. And we’re stuck with chrome and safari. But if people support Mozilla too much then they’ll just do whatever they want, like this AI nonsense.

                • cabbage@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  Yeah, it’s tricky. I donated to Mozilla in the past, will look into making some donations to Servo moving forwards as I really think that’s the way things are headed for me. I keep trying to use GNOME Web which is WebKit based and it keeps getting better, but it’s not quite there yet for me. So for now Mozilla is my best bet in spite of everything.

        • chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah Librewolf does go really fucking hard on security/privacy to the detriment of functionality, but the are upfront with that so you shouldn’t be going in completely blind. I think Water Fox is a nice happy medium for users that don’t want to fuck around with technical stuff.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It might be easier to soften Librewolf than harden Firefox, but fair point.

          If you’re a relatively normal user and you still want to use LibreWolf, I would recommend:

          • disable fingerprinting
          • not clearing history on exit

          Most of this is easy to find, especially thanks to the LibreWolf menu

          • eli@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah it’s all just in the GUI to enable and disable what you don’t want.

            I don’t get what people are complaining about with LibreWolf being “too hard”. Like it’s 1 minute clicking through menus and you’re done. 5 minutes if you need to read and search things up real quick.

            But LibreWolf, ublock installed by default, and then set up containers. Just pure bliss.

            • XLE@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              For us, sure. For the average Joe who doesn’t know about the side effects of fingerprinting, not so much.

            • deleted@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              It broke youtube for me yesterday and mind you I’m a web developer and I didn’t know what broke it exactly to turn it on/off.

              It fixed it self today though.

              • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                That was almost certainly YouTube breaking itself. They do a lot of public A-B testing without notifying the user of anything, even if it could break functionality.

                The chances of Librewolf breaking, and updating in 24 hours is basically zero. Especially if you’re on Windows since it doesn’t update itself, you have to choose to install the separate updater application when you install Librewolf, otherwise it just doesn’t update.

                https://codeberg.org/librewolf/librewolf-winupdater

                https://librewolf.net/docs/faq/

                How often do you update LibreWolf?

                LibreWolf is always based on the latest version of Firefox. Updates usually come within three days from each upstream stable release, at times even the same day. Unless problems arise, we always try to release often and in a timely manner.

                It should however be noted that LibreWolf does not have auto-update capabilities, and therefore it relies on package managers or users to apply them.

                • deleted@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Yeah I agree it was probably a/b testing since I use ublock origin as well so I’m use to this kind of stuff.

                  But the point I’m trying to make that I didn’t know at that time librewolf would have settings turned on that could break some websites.

              • eli@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                To be fair, YouTube is a giant piece of shit. On mobile, IronFox and Firefox are terrible with it, but switching to Chrome and everything loads instantly.

                We all know Google is purposely slowing down non-chrome browsers.

            • Nelots@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Maybe, but if you want Librewolf but less extreme, that’s what Waterfox is for. May as well just install that and avoid the 5 minute search. And this is coming from a long time Librewolf user.

          • fizzle@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I just enable canvas on sites that need it.

            Thats the only part of RFP that I find problematic.

        • Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          It only breaks sites because RFP is on by default and some greedy sites dont like RFP. You can just turn it off and use a good user agent mask (if you care about fingerprinting)

          • Nelots@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            It can cause issues with default settings on the occasional site.

            Since I had it on hand, here's a screenshot of what I encountered when playing Jackbox with friends. All images would look like this.

            MlYJ6D0Bnz8fAUv.png

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I remember having ff and then switching to chrome because it was better, and then switching back to ff because it was better. I’m ok leaving ff again.

  • maplesaga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I use Duck.AI a lot, and it says its privacy oriented and doesnt save your queries. Is Firefox doing anything similar, or is it all monetized data?

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Much like Adobe‘s Acrobat which I also have to use for work. At least from what I can tell when it suddenly summarizes a PDF. There‘s no way in hell that happens locally. But the fact that it seemingly automatically processes potentially sensitive data from customers didn‘t even do as little as raising eyebrows when I brought it up.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I use Firefox as a PDF reader at work. it’s better than Adobe Reader or Chrome, and it’s good enough, so I haven’t bothered finding something else.

      I deal with secure information sometimes, in PDF form. I haven’t even considered that this information might not remain local.

    • Analog@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      No way in hell? My understanding is that an NPU could perform that type of processing locally. I welcome info & correction!

      (I know other types of local ai processors could too, but there’s little chance Acrobat would be geared to look for them - even GPUs - unlike NPUs.)

      Now if we switch to talking about policy instead of capability, I don’t think Adobe would miss a chance to be evil. So yeah they’re probably stealing all the data they possibly can.

        • Analog@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          True! More all the time, unfortunately. (Unfortunately because we’re paying for tech we don’t want.)

          Also doesn’t negate my argument. He said no way in hell, yet… not only is there a way but it’s already out there.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            oh I mostly agree, but forgot to include the quote. I wanted to say, all that AI processing probably does not happen locally

    • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      If your company has an enterprise/privacy agreement with Adobe, it might be considered addressed, similar to the millions of companies using Microsoft 365 and Sharepoint.

      If, OTOH, it’s a “free” feature of Adobe, it could be eating your company’s data without constraints.

      If the latter, let us know your company’s name so that we can avoid it.