• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        “Australia and Oceania” here, in the first of two models I’ll elaborate on.

        We were taught two different models

        First one translates basically as “divisions of the world”

        • Europe
        • Asia
        • Africa
        • Antarctica
        • Australia and Oceania
        • Americas

        The other one translates more directly as “continents”

        • Eurasia
        • Africa
        • Antarctica
        • Australia
        • North America
        • South America

        But those are of course not the only models, just the ones taught in school where I’m from.

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    In the great words of Atlas Pro after going into excruciating detail on why no answer is more correct He said:

    So gow many continents are there?

    “Obviously six”

    No further clarification was given.

  • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    All you need is one nitwit arguing for a nonsense position for there to be “no agreement.”

    There are 7 continents. Anyone who disagrees is just soapboxing for clout.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      6, actually. Eurasia is one continent and it takes a lot of mental gymnastics to claim there are two separate continents there.

    • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The result might be an agreement that may not satisfy everyone completely, but indicates the overall concurrence of the group. – WP:DISCUSSCONSENSUS

      What I’m saying is that one idiot disagreeing does not break consensus.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Europe isn’t a continent, it’s a political entity. A continent is geographic. EurAsia is a continent.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Lol no. The european union is the political entity. Europe is a continent. Asia is a continent. If you want to talk about both of them together you can say eurasia but they are not one continent.

      • invertedspear@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What delineates Europe from Asia that shouldn’t also delineate India from Asia?

        Not trying to be argumentative, curious. I’ve always heard of India as a subcontinent, and when explained why it seems like Europe fits the same description.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They are one continuous landmass. A continent is one continuous landmass. You can’t split a single landmass and call it two separate continents.

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 hours ago

            There are going to be little isthmuses connecting landmasses, but that doesn’t make them combined. Africa is technically connected to both Europe and Asia, but nobody is suggesting that they be combined with Europe and Asia. Europe and Asia are literally the same landmass, with just a border between them.

            Even the Middle East probably has a better claim on being a Continent than Europe.

            Besides, the Panama Canal essentially makes North And South America separated by water.

            • fenrasulfr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Aren’t Europe and Asia on the same techtonic plate? Isn’t that also the reason India is considered a subcontinent because it is on a different techtonic plate?

              • mrlemmyhimself@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Iceland is between two tectonic plates, and that rule would separate the Somali plate from the rest of Africa, make the Caribbean its own continent, etc

          • homura1650@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            North and South America are joined by a thin strip of land that serves as the continent border. Africa and Eurasia are joined by a thin strip that serves as a continent barrier. Europe and Asia have no natural border between them.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    13 hours ago

    There’s between 3 and 500. Since it’s statistically unlikely that the correct number would be at either extreme, the most likely correct number of continents would be somewhere around 250, with a margin of error of approximately 245.

  • ominous ocelot@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Of course there isn’t. There are 10 billion people on earth. I even disagree with myself on the matter.

    PS: TIL too.