cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/45445434

Fox News Senior Medical Analyst Marc Siegel made some eyebrow-raising comments lamenting that birth rates are down among teenagers aged 15 to 19.

On Thursday, the National Center for Health Statistics reported that the U.S. fertility rate fell to another record low. The agency reported that the number of births per 1,000 women of childbearing age declined from 53.8 in 2024 to 53.1 last year. The latest figure represents a continuation of a decades-long decline in fertility rates.

Siegel joined Friday’s edition of America’s Newsroom, where Dana Perino said that while the continuing trend is not surprising, “the numbers might feel a little shocking.”

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They’re Republicans. Of course they are concerned about teen pregnancies.

      Who do you think is making them pragernet?

    • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They were angry about “single mothers” for decades, but that was a racist dog whistle.

      If you’re all white, it’s all right.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    15 hours ago

    How many times do conservatives have to prove that they’re all pedophiles before the rest of us will learn?

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      not a matter of “learning”, it’s a matter of “caring”

      everyone knows by now this regime is full of pedophiles… but nobody gives enough of a fuck to do anything about it

    • mika_mika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Now, now, let’s not pretend these people are encouraging sex, those young whores are still to be shamed.

      They’re just supposed to have kids and be loyal to husbando. No pleasure involved.

      (Also, they always supported teen pregnancy because they have always been anti-sex education and anti-contraceptive which allows the process of teenage parents to happen without them having to condone it).

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 day ago

    I remember when teen pregnancy was considered bad and a sign of a decaying morality across the country. Now the same right wing moralizers are saying they need those teen moms again. But this time it’s about money so they are noticeably quiet about morality.

    • d00ery@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      And don’t forget future soldiers are needed. There’s a place for everyone.

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I remember when teen pregnancy was considered bad and a sign of a decaying morality across the country.

      before that it was commonplace though. I’m 61, my grandmother started having her kids at 16, she had 8, one of them my mother, the youngest of her kids. Many of her friends were similarly 15-19 having thier first kid. My mother was 19 with me, I was born when she turned 20. She had 3 kids, i have none, my sister none and my brother 2, so family dynamics have changed.

      This is Australia though, you can read books of some of the early convict ships coming over and they arrived with all the 13-16yr old girls pregnant, or having had their kid on board and being married etc

      You can see some of the effect in The Philippines, pregnant teen mothers are everywhere. Religious indoctrination in regards anti contraception doesn’t stop teens fucking (and this in a nation with no divorce)

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Only locally it’s a bad thing. Nationally, they need those girls waiting tables in diners. How else is someone going to get their nostalgia kick while driving route 66?

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    1 day ago

    They’re saying the quiet part out loud and why they’re anti-abortion. The younger the better for a quick turnaround:

    They need the poors to fight their wars and work on their factory floors.

    • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 day ago

      I frequently just stand outside and look at the sky and think, yep, we weren’t meant to work all day. We were meant to pick berries and mushrooms and take naps. I feel better about my station in life, knowing those oligarchs can never be satisfied, and all I have to do to feel right is take a walk outside.

        • 0ops@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, that’s why we can run

          Edit: Distance running that is. Humans have better endurance than almost any land animal, so we can chase prey to exhaustion. It helps that we’re crafty enough to carry water and snacks with us

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not an expert, but that would depend on the location, probably. Smaller game, certainly, but not everyone had large animals roaming around. Likewise, there were probably people who hunted and didn’t gather that much because there simply wasn’t that type of plant around.

          But the point made still stands: modern life is not something natural to our evolution.

          • mika_mika@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Peoples would migrate across continents to follow the populations of animals if there were no large animals presently roaming around.

            Given that, I think it’s safe to guess most early humans were more than willing to put in a little more effort to hunt over gather regardless of location.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      No, they want robots to work in the factories, because they don’t complain and don’t unionize, and don’t take time off, and work for electrons.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They want to not have to pay the people who will be buying the things produced in the factories.

        The logical problem with that is too many steps ahead for them to see.

      • mika_mika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah, but the good news is they are going to keep us desperate and dependent until that can be attained with certainty just in case that plan doesn’t work out for them and they’re stuck with us.

  • Beesbeesbees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    22 hours ago

    And guess who the fathers to those teen pregnancies are? It’s men over 20. Adding a layer of ick to what he’s lamenting.

  • crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    1 day ago

    I distinctly remember a time when boomers and talking heads would automatically respond to concerns about issues with the cost of having kids with:

    “Don’t have kids if you can’t afford them.”

    “If you couldn’t afford kids then you should’ve kept your legs closed.”

    “Don’t expect a handout, nobody forced you to have kids.”

    “Healthcare and child care are too expensive? Tough shit snowflake, that’s the free market! Work harder!”

    “Why are my taxes paying for a public school when I don’t even have any kids that go there?”

    So nope, no sympathies. And no, you can’t have your child sex brides, either.

    • Soleos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      They are still saying this when it’s convenient for them. The only consistent thing for such people is their cowardice in the face of responsibility.