• Saapas@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Are you saying we’re going to see Sabrina Carpenter pooping in the next Met Gala?

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t know what’s sadder, people paying attention to some incels obsessing about women or people paying attention to celebrities and met gala.

    • Wolf314159@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Admiring artistic fashion choices by people that often make other kinds of popular art and denouncing the reactions of misogynists attempting to demean and dehumanize those artists simply because they are women are two VERY different things. What’s sadder is your “both sides” reaction to a clearly toxic attitude vs. people exhibiting art through fashion.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 minutes ago

        Social media conditions people to seek outrage everywhere… even if they have to invent things to feel outraged about.

        If you can’t tell if im talking about your comment, the one you replied to, or the OP, there’s a reason.

        That’s the actual sad. In the empathetic sense, not in the sarcastic way it’s being used in the above conversation.

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Where the hair?! That’s shaven, but not to extreme levels of wax that shit into oblivion this morning. Hollywood and porn industry basically since 90s has just brainwashed society into believing body hair is disgusting and weird. For some reason. It’s also especially funny when you descend into “Hairy” section of the porn and it’s just normal women with normal levels of body hair. Like, not even full yeti, just some armpit hair and a bit of a bush downstairs. That’s not “hairy”, that’s just “normal” woman.

    Firstly be what makes YOU comfortable, then look for what others might care. I’ve tried shaving fully to silky smooth levels and it’s really not comfortable in a lot of places of body.

    • applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 hours ago

      just want to remind people that humans have been shaving various areas of their bodies for thousands of years. they did it in ancient Rome. we’ve probably been removing body hair for much longer than that even. it’s not a modern thing it’s just the fashion right now. personally idgaf whether other people remove their body hair or not. I like to though, it feels nice and makes me feel sexy.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Her underarm hair was visible?!

    Never mind Jeffery’s paedophile cabal, how will higher society ever get over such controversy as a woman’s armpit hair being visible??

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Her underarm hair was visible?!

      Only if zoom in to basically be 10cm from her armpit. So for all normal, sane purposes, no it wasn’t.

  • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Ngl some pit hair kinds goes with that fit. Not that the stubble there is what I’d consider pit hair. Imagine if some dude claimed that same amount was a “full beard”.

    • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      People who are into the natural human body as nature intended. That’s me.

      I’m not necessarily into armpit hair, but I honestly don’t care if there’s any. Fake boobs, ass, face, i.e. anything fake is a turn off for me.