These were all recommended from the same video without refreshing the page

    • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m (barely) ashamed to admit that that one also captivated my attention.

      I zoomed in to see where Rodney was looking, but the image was too blurry. (zoomed in on HIS face)

  • tackleberry
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    On youtube, you have to learn to use the DON’T RECOMMEND CHANNEL BUTTON a lot

    There is too much A.I. slop on yt spewing out wrong information and trying to rewrite history it is disgusting.

    • Xechon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I get that I’m apparently the weird one here, but I don’t get why people put up with this instead of just using your subscriptions feed. I turned off watch history a long time ago and it has been great.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve found loads of actually good and interesting high effort content from recommendations.

        • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Indeed. I understand the algorithm hate round here, and if someone decides that they don’t want any recommendations from Google at all that’s their business, but I do appreciate some of what they send my way. Recently, whether due to a tweak on the back end or a quirk of my recent watch history, I’ve found I’ve been getting a fair number of very small channels filtering into my recommendations. Without those recs, I’m never gonna find someone’s 712 view video from 3 years ago about scratch building an original spaceship design, so I’m happy to have a space where those can show up in addition to my personally curated subscription feed.

          • tackleberry
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            The challenge is the load of A.I. slop it throws my way. I appreciate the big and small channels that share actual helpful information.

            Every time I visit youtube, I have to block at least 30 A.I. slop channels

      • comradegodzilla@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is what I do. I’ve had history turned off for a few years now. It’s also helped curtail my watching if YouTube since it won’t recommend more stuff.

  • wetsoggybread@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is just YouTube default algorithm now. Ai slop videos that are so obviously fake and often all they are is just a slideshow of ai images along with a text to speech narrator reading AI text

        • Krudler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          From the user’s standpoint yes. From site operator standpoint, no.

          Worse than worthless traffic. Hoards of content locusts descend on your site, ad blockers up, fuck over your server, provide 0 ad clicks/conversions and leave you -$10 profit.

          Edit: downvotes do not surprise me, why would a selfish user ever consider what they’re taking from someone else? After all, they need to be entertained! After 2 years of our site getting completely flooded, I eventually redirected stumble upon traffic. Like I said, worse than useless, actively damaging to the site and spoiling the experience for the positive users.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m convinced this is a psyop to make boomers and older genx question their own memory. this opens the door for further washing and manipulation.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Remember when trained professional fighters used to randomly fight people in the audience?

      Yep. Problem was how often they’d accidentally pick Bruce Lee

    • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’ve been using YouTube since before Google bought it. I remember having to merge accounts at one point.

      • Evil_Shrubbery
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yeah, pre shit-show webshites like YouTube, Reddit/Imgur, etc were great, but they had profit incentive.

        It’s why we must cherish & support the relatively (by comparison) unenshitified services like Wiki, even Mozilla, etc. (+ ofc all the great foss projects).

  • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    This racist man pooped today he didnt know his “poop” was actually Bruce Lee and the president and an old farmer

  • taco_shale032@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You’d like the DeArrow browser extension.

    DeArrow is an open source browser extension for crowdsourcing better titles and thumbnails on YouTube. The goal is to make titles accurate and reduce sensationalism. No more arrows, ridiculous faces, and no more clickbait.

    […]

    Titles can be any arbitrary text. Thumbnails are screenshots from specific timestamps in the video. These are user submitted and voted on. By default, if there are no submissions, it will format the original title to the user-specified format, and set a screenshot from a random timestamp as the thumbnail. This can be configured in the options to disable formatting, or show the original thumbnail by default.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    i read somewhere that ai will generally compose images of humans using the same 8 or 9 poses and camera positions

    ai must have gathered that the pointing thing must be a key-frame human activity

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yup.

    I made a video earlier this year about how you can (over time) train the algorithm to give you less of this crap. Unfortunately there’s just no concrete setting for turning off recommendations that contain AI slop, but you can tell the system to give you less with a little engagement.