• Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Li said that students could get the genetic or hormone test options listed in the initiative, in lieu of a genital exam.

    Ok, what about when those things don’t match the assigned sex? What do we do with those kids? If we start doing mass hormone and chromosome testing, I think we’re going to find that there are a lot more “edge cases” than we think there are.

  • GenderIsOpSec [she/her, kit/kit's]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    Dr. Erica Li, a pediatrician who supports Heywood’s measure to block trans girls from girls’ teams, acknowledged that sports physicals don’t currently require sex verification.

    But she noted that other types of exams do, such as annual pediatrician checkups, which are more robust than a sports signoff.

    Every child who sees a pediatrician regularly should receive a brief genital exam at some point “to confirm that puberty is progressing properly,” Li said. Doctors could use this information to confirm birth sex without conducting a separate visual inspection for the sports physical, she said.

    Li said that students could get the genetic or hormone test options listed in the initiative, in lieu of a genital exam. She also said a doctor could review a student’s birth records, though language in the initiative does not mention that alternative.

    daily i’m reminded that most doctors in germany joined the nazi party

    • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      They managed to check if my puberty was progressing properly by simply asking me in a questionnaire. I never had my genitals examined as a child. Neither have my own children.

      Are yank doctors really fondling the genitalia of children for no good reason?

    • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Every child who sees a pediatrician regularly should receive a brief genital exam at some point “to confirm that puberty is progressing properly,” Li said

      Someone needs to check this freak’s hard drive tbqh.

  • BigMacHole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 day ago

    I VOLUNTEER to Look at Children’s Genitals!

    -People who think Trans people are Pedophiles!

  • hellinkilla [they/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    They want that it would become part of regular medical practice to issue some sort of certificate of true sex to children. I really dont think doctors would take that into their work. Even if they found one who would. It’s too weird. That one doctor knows it and is thinking she is gonna get herself a nice little business opportunity as one of the few who will debase themselves and drag their own profession into further disrepute by humoring these fanatics. So she will have a tidy little business issuing “certificates”. Maybe even get contracted by leagues or other bodies to mandate all players go to her as an official assessor of “sex”.

    Actually the proposal is similar to virginity testing which is something some people want doctors to do. And some do do, but its a big headache. Except apparently in Quebec, which might be out of racism more than feminism.

    In either case, putting aside the bigoted reasons for wanting it, actually implementing a screening like this would create a lot of hassle for the medical system because as everyone here knows, even “biological sex” is a spectrum, there is not “a test” that can be done like these people want. Even those doctors who chose to involve themselves in “sex testing”, like at the Olympics, quickly become all tangled up in arguments. Nobody needs that in their life. Health care system has enough problems and attempting to satisfy these assholes is not going to even get onto the list. A law like this would lead to even more skill + brain drain as lib doctors get stressed out having to argue with parents about this stupid shit, decide to just move to a different jurisdiction.

    The other day I posted a story about UK doctors having their licenses taken away for saying “I do not condemn hamas” but in the US, it seems doctors can say absolutely anything. Cant believe the license much less speciality in pediatrics is not in question when advocating for these totally anti scientific hateful practices.

    • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Actually the proposal is similar to virginity testing which is something some people want doctors to do. And some do do

      Point of order. I know you aren’t suggesting otherwise but, in fact, no one does this because it is not a thing that is possible. Some attempt it, and those people should be minced.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    Dr. Erica Li, a pediatrician who supports Heywood’s measure to block trans girls from girls’ teams, acknowledged that sports physicals don’t currently require sex verification.

    But she noted that other types of exams do, such as annual pediatrician checkups

    America is fucking weird. You have pediatricians that fiddle with kids bits once a year and that’s supposedly normal? Where the fuck is this happening and why haven’t I heard of it before?

    • PleasantPeasant [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      american. in my annual checkups there was never any “fiddling” with my genitals, doctor would just check for hernia by asking me to do that cough thing while pressing on my groin but there was no touching of genitals and i dont even remember ever having to pull my pants/underwear down far enough to where the doctor could even see my genitals

    • Inui [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s things like checking for testicular cancer/anomalies, worms, etc. I’d be surprised if other countries don’t do that.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not normal over here at all. If you’ve got a problem and report that problem then sure, you can see a doctor and have a checkup. But annual checkups that include a genital inspection without an actual reason? Completely unnecessary. In fact, annual checkups aren’t a thing here either. If you tried to book in “I just want a check up” any UK surgery is going to respond with “Ok what for? What are your symptoms?”

        I’m genuinely being culture-shocked by this shit. It’s weird as fuck because it’s totally unnecessary.

        • hellinkilla [they/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          Children are different because they can’t articulate problems, and because sometimes parents have weird or wrong ideas that should be redirected. Kids dont come with instruction manuals. Its hard for parents to know the difference between their kid being weird and sick.

          In the UK there is a thing called health visitor that does some of the stuff of a regular check up in a different context. Somebody needs to do things like monitor weight and other basic screenings. Vaccines are often rolled into it too. In the US that stuff is more likely done at a medical office either by a doctor or under their supervision. Some of it could also be done at school.

          This is all globally understood, here is a document (powepoint sorta thing) from UNICEF that kind of goes over the broad strokes https://www.childhealthtaskforce.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/FINAL COMBINED_WHO_UNICEF_Well Care Visits Global Webinar.pdf There are international guidelines that can be rolled out in different ways. Here is a list of screenings currently reccomended by the NHS for various ages groups. That means they are exams and tests that are done for no reason other than “everyone should be checked”.

          I don’t think anybody older than 4ish needs annual genital exams unless they have a specific reason but a lot of people even adults expect that kind if thing as routine. It depends on culture. A friend of mine who grew up in the rubble of the USSR told me that starting around puberty someone came to school and all the girls had to line up for vaginal exams every year. She didn’t even know what they were looking for but it was culturally normal and everyone just went along with it.

          In general its more old fashioned to expect very thorough routine exams as a person becomes an adult. Modern health care is more confident at doing things like waiting for adults to identify their own problems. There are also various economic and social tensions pushing and pulling.

        • Sam [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          NHS doctors don’t do annual physicals because they barely have time to do direct treatment to seriously engage in preventive measures like that. Go look at private doctors in the UK though and you will find that they all offer these services.

        • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          In fact, annual checkups aren’t a thing here either.

          Maybe start there, because checkups are part of preventative care and much better for public health than waiting to go to the doctor only when something is clearly wrong. I don’t have any particularly strong opinion on how checking testicles is handled and if another method would be better, but in the most general terms yes it does make sense to have a medical expert check there (and other places where it’s very easy to check for symptoms of severe conditions, e.g. lymph node swelling, which can be in the genitals but also other areas) rather than exclusively rely on the child and parents who are notably not medical experts (though of course they are also given instruction on checking and reporting).

          • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            If that were true then there would be evidence that stopping them decades ago had a negative impact, but it did not.

            • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m confused why something like that could just be flatly asserted. There are lots of articles you can find about underdiagnosis in the UK of conditions that things like generalized regular checks make an effort to find. Aside from the public health topic in a more general sense, could you explain about annual checkups being stopped decades ago? I’d be interested to learn about the history there but I’m having a hard time finding it because I’m pretty bad at this sort of thing.

        • Guamer [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          side thing, but exclusively going to the doctor when an overt symptom emerges can be bad, as stuff like cancer/diabetes/etc can go undetected and fester