• Babs [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is being sold as a security measure, but it’s really a heavily-lobbied economic measure to benefit a single American drone company. Skydio, DJI’s largest American competitor, can’t compete with cheap Chinese drones used for commercial purposes like farming and surveying, so over the last two years they have spent over a million dollars on lobbying efforts to take out their rival. https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/clients/summary?cycle=2022&id=D000086902

    Skydio drones are expensive, and the company has deep ties with American, British, and Israeli militaries. They have also completely pulled out of the consumer market, focusing purely on commercial and military drones, so a DJI ban will be a serious blow to drone hobbyists, independent professional pilots, and smaller companies that can’t afford to pay thousands of dollars for a drone that they used to be able to get for $400-$1000.

    • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 months ago

      For those of us who don’t remember high school US history very well:

      [Passed in 1930] The Act and tariffs imposed by America’s trading partners in retaliation were major factors of the reduction of American exports and imports by 67% during the Great Depression. Economists and economic historians have a consensus view that the passage of the Smoot–Hawley Tariff worsened the effects of the Great Depression.

      • pumpchilienthusiast [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Today we have a similar debate over this. Anyone know what this is? Class? Anyone? Anyone? Anyone seen this before? The Laffer Curve. Anyone know what this says? It says that at this point on the revenue curve, you will get exactly the same amount of revenue as at this point. This is very controversial. Does anyone know what Vice President Bush called this in 1980? Anyone? Something-d-o-o economics. “Voodoo” economics.

  • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    you know what’ll help America compete in drone warfare, obviously the biggest change in warfare since nukes?

    shutting off all hobbyists so your next generation never played with drones as a high schooler

    • darkcalling [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      In their opinion it doesn’t matter.

      Firstly because either the US is going to war with China within the next 8 years or it’s not happening because the US would be at such a disadvantage and like all bullies they won’t pick a fight with an evenly matched opponent. Secondly because military drone systems used by the US are not really like those used by other countries. For example, Russia and Ukraine are using near off the shelf kit and standing in a field while US drones are controlled from a bunker or command shack or place on a US navy ship from a system that looks like it’s from a Dave and Busters racing game with the whole big seat, multiple monitors, joy-stick and additional controls. US is just not interested in that kind of drone warfare. They’ve gone all in on the idea of semi-autonomous “AI” systems and swarms controlled by 1-2 trained people per swarm from a great distance. Thirdly the US has long had this image of it’s military as this highly trained, highly disciplined, elite force while simultaneously seeing Russians/Chinese as “hordes” of under-trained, under-motivated, under-equipped canon fodder so they turn up their nose to certain types of tactics as being for those others.

      Fourth, the US is worried about domestic insurrection and discontent over worsening economic conditions. The worse thing you want to do in that situation is empower the ordinary people to wage insurrection using the type of tactics and methods (drones) field-proven by unconventional militias and militant groups across the middle east. These types of drones and easy cheap access to them is also a nightmare for operational security of military bases and internal security forces operations.

      Unironically the US wants and is working hard on killbots they can fire and forget for attacks and area denial. They know among other things they can’t fight China navy to navy over Taiwan so instead the plan shifts to this idea of naval and aerial drones, semi-autonomous that are basically killbots or self-propelled targeting mines that they’d unleash in the hundreds and thousands in the straits to deny China the ability to send landing craft or support ships near Taiwan and buy them time to hold the island and strike at and destroy China’s navy from beyond the horizon. This is actually not a bad answer to the problem of traditional mining that mine-sweeper ships can just clear an area, mine-sweepers don’t work if the mines actively hone in on and swarm your clearing ship when you get anywhere near any of them.

      The US military is not agile in the way the Russian military or the Ukrainian bandits are. It’s a big, expensive, lumbering machine and that’s the way they like it and that’s the way it’s going to be because it produces more profit for Raytheon and because it suits their self-image.

      The real losers are local EMS, fire, cops, even the FBI who get hit in the budget much harder acquiring drones now.

    • GaveUp [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      These are not the same drones used lol

      Ukraine uses them cause they’re poor and need to be scrappy

      America ain’t gonna do this

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    DJI, which sells more than half of all drones in the United States, opposes the bill that it said “restricts the ability of U.S. drone operators to buy and use the right equipment for their work, solely on the basis of the equipment’s country of origin.”

    America is stupid

  • Chronicon [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    honestly I’d love to get into drones but I have no desire to register with the FAA or get some shit that’s going to get shut down remotely by government fiat in a few months to years, so I guess DIY and under 250g is the spot to start.

    edit: ah shit ardupilot looks sick and some diy 250g drones actually have decent runtime it looks like

      • Chronicon [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        from the article:

        The bill, which still needs to be approved by the U.S. Senate before it could become law, would prohibit the company’s products from operating on U.S. communications infrastructure.

        clearly targeting the operation of drones that are flown over cellular connections. Short range RF remotes probably wouldn’t be affected but I could see smartphone apps getting pulled as well