The Lemmy Club
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
bdonvr
cake
A to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years ago

I feel like it takes effort to be this uninformed

message-square
43
link
fedilink
175

I feel like it takes effort to be this uninformed

bdonvr
cake
A to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
43
link
fedilink

https://lemmy.world/comment/3519515

Why do libs always rush to defend abhorrent things with “🤓👆but achtually it’s technically not illegal”.

And in any case, according to the unanimous vote (sans US and Israel ofc) in the UN every year, the blockade is illegal and a violation of the UN Charter.

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • judgeholden@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s funny because what they say the US isn’t doing is exactly what the US is doing.

    • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 years ago

      when you learn geopolitics by playing paradox games

  • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    “America can trade with whoever they want”

    IT LITERALLY STOPS COUNTRIES THAT TRADED WITH CUBA FROM TRADING WITH THE USA. IF YOU DOCK A SHIP IN CUBA, THAT SHIP CAN’T BE DOCKED IN THE USA FOR ANOTHER 13 (?) MONTHS, SINCE AMERICA IS THE ECONOMIC CENTER OF GRAVITY OF THE ENTIRE WESTERN HEMISPHERE, THIS EFFECTIVELY BLOCKS CUBA FROM GETTING THINGS IT NEEDS LIKE MEDICAL EQUIPMENTS, WHILE BASICALLY THREATENING TO SABOTAGE THE ECONOMY OF ANYONE WHO TRADES WITH CUBA!!! IT’S NOT JUST AMERICA “NOT WANTING TO TRADE WITH CUBA” AS A “PROTEST” TO CUBA’S “AUTHORITARIANISM”. THE EMBARGO HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR 60 YEARS AND WAS BASICALLY AMERICA TAKING REVENGE ON CUBA FOR NATIONALIZING ITS SUGAR INDUSTRIES AND REFUSING TO BE A CASINO FOR THE AMERICAN MAFIA. WHERE ARE THESE “LEGALIST” ARGUMENTS WHEN IT COMES TO THE AMERICAN TORTURE DUNGEONS IN GUANTANAMO BAY, WHICH IS CUBAN SOVEREIGN TERRITORY AND WHICH CUBA HAS REJECTED OUTRIGHT FOR DECADES??? lenin-rage

    THE UN HAS VOTED TO END THE EMBARGO FOR 30 YEARS STRAIGHT BUT AMERICA DOESN’T CARE:

    THE ONLY COUNTRY THAT SIDES WITH AMERIKKKA ON THIS IS ISNTRAEL AND (KINDA SORTA) UKKKRAINE

    • bdonvr
      cake
      OPA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thanks comrade for your measured and appropriate response.

      • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 years ago

        spongebob-i-fucking-love YOU’RE WELCOME

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.netBannedBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      I can’t understand Ukraine’s position on this. This was their position prior to the invasion too. It must be America simping. Most other European countries, including those that were invaded by Russia and have beef with Russia, support Cuba despite its automatic siding with Russia on every issue.

      • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 years ago

        This was their position prior to the invasion too.

        Ukraine got couped in 2004 first. And that’s on top of the already nationalist government from 1991. Shit politics there absolutely did not start with the current war

        • novibe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          2014*

          • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 years ago

            Nope. Here’s a link. . 2014 was a second coup. I know my history.

            • novibe@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Correct comrade, sorry for that.

      • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        lol, even the biggest US simps in Europe like Germany, Finland and TERF Island voted to end the embargo though.

    • ComradeEchidna@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

  • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    2 years ago

    Legalism is the worst argument as it ignores so many factors at play, like wow. The biggest economy in the Americas is abusing their power dynamics to strangle a smaller nation at its doorstep, just because it had the gall to defy them.

    And yet China is considered the worse and more evil to these people, despite not acting as bad as the US on its breakaway state on its doorstep.

    If China did something like an embargo they would be yelling murder and crying crocodile tears.

    • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 years ago

      China is evil because they didn’t get a septugenarian from Kansas to say that it’s legal for them to give money aid to African countries without demanding blood sacrifice.

  • bdonvr
    cake
    OPA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    And also I don’t think the embargo is America’s worst modern crime against Cuba. Their worst crime is desecrating the pure soil of Cuba with a McDonald’s (in the illegally occupied territory/torture camp of Guantanamo Bay)

    Though in good news I’m hoping to visit Cuba next summer. Any advice on visiting?

    • Flyberius [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Stay in casa particulars (no hotels or resorts). Take a lot of euros or dollars with you. You can exchange the for pesos on the street for a much higher rate than at the bank. Save some of those euros/dollars for long taxi rides. Absolutely use express VPN if you intend to book buses using their viazul website. You won’t be able to pay for your bus otherwise. First thing you do when you get there is try to acquire a sim card. I would advise doing it officially and not picking one up of a street vendor as 50% of the time you’ll find the SIM gets cancelled.

      Visit baracoa, viñales, Santa Clara, Santiago de Cuba, Trinidad, and Havana (both old Havana and the suburbs).

      Drink a canchanchera. Go to all the local music halls you can. Drink a michelada. Smoke their cigarettes (Jesus they are good). Eat the seafood in baracoa. Dance. Try not to get too caught up in tourist traps. Talk to locals (learn more Spanish than I did). Have fun.

      • bdonvr
        cake
        OPA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Thanks! I don’t get very much time off unfortunately so I will only spend a week, so probably just Havana and surrounding areas. Perhaps a train or bus ride to Santa Clara is possible. But it would be an entire days travel to the east end of the island.

  • ewichuu@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • PeeOnYou [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 years ago

      and sometimes they’re not careful to pass those laws first, and blatantly disregard their own laws and treaties, but it’s still the “RULES based international order” which technically is accurate because the biggest guy makes the rules. So nothing to see here!

      • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun”

        • Barrack Obamna
  • TomboyShulk [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Folks, it never fails a-little-trolling

    • bdonvr
      cake
      OPA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      What’s the context? Chastising a comrade for not donating to the Dems lmao?

      • TomboyShulk [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        2 years ago

        arguing that hexbear is using trans and gay people as a shield for, uh, conniving schemes, or something vivian-shrug

  • Wertheimer [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 years ago

    The UN is a political organization and says whatever countries vote it to say. It’s also not a legislative organization, it’s basically a big political club of people who like to write strongly worded letters about things. Only the UNSC has teeth, and that hasn’t declared it illegal for obvious reasons.

    The U.S. can veto its own condemnation, therefore the U.S. can never be condemned. Checkmate, tankies.

    • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 years ago

      they’re right, “international law” is a joke that large nations use to justify their treatment of small nations, but never vice versa.

      • JuneFall [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        International law:

        This book critically examines existing theories of international law and makes the case for an alternative Marxist approach. China Miéville draws on the pioneering jurisprudence of Evgeny Pashukanis linking law to commodity exchange, and in turn uses international law to make better sense of Pashukanis. Miéville argues that despite its advances, the recent ‘New Stream’ of radical international legal scholarship, like the mainstream it opposes, fails to make sense of the legal form itself. Drawing on Marxist theory and a critical history of international law from the sixteenth century to the present day, Miéville seeks to address that failure, and argues that international law is fundamentally constituted by the violence of imperialism.

        • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          i’m a fanboy, you had me at mieville

  • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s never illegal to not trade with a country

    The WTO has entered the chat

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.netBannedBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      The British fought China twice over this lol

    • JuneFall [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      The whole argument is one that works well in their head, but not in continuity of the existing world and its political conditions. The WTO example is a good one, even if OP’s point were true, then contracts created and such can still lead to stuff being effectively illegal. That they ignore the base level in addition to the WTO angle means there is no discussion with them at all.

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 years ago

    Never mind the U.S. Control over global finance.

  • asg101 [none/use name, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hard to fight deliberate ignorance.

  • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    Opening dialogue with “Yeah. No.” will instantly make me want to bash your noggin off the sidewalk no matter what words follow it

    • SkingradGuard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      “Yeah. No.” smuglord

      • DanComrd [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        rage-cry

    • Zodiark [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Don’t listen to thinky-felix 's rambling monologues about buying a new sword or gaming too hard.

      angery

  • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah, you know what also was legal under the legal framework of the countries that did them? Fucking slavery and the Holocaust.

  • FactuallyUnscrupulou [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    If money is a form of speech, it’s actually unconstitutional to deny me the ability to purchase something. Therefore an embargo that prevents me from buying Cuban cigars is illegal.

    smuglord

    • bdonvr
      cake
      OPA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m actually planning on going next summer, and the American government has a very long list of places in Cuba that it is apparently ILLEGAL for me to spend money at. (basically any Government owned place, which being a socialist nation is quite a lot) This includes basically all hotels for example.

      It’s illegal for me to go to another country and spend money at a hotel, according to MY government. Land of the free lmao wtf

  • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    Cuz legality is all they got. Legalism is basically weaponized philosophy. “Sovereignty of nations” eat my fucking ass and go fuck a wall. Just go and ignore all the financial wealth Cuba has been denied for decades because of the embargo. Cruelty via indifference is still cruel. If the “rules” say something bad you don’t use it as an excuse. You don’t wallow in it like filth. You change the fucking rules.

    • JuneFall [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Sovereignty of nations

      What is the socialist claim for that (or the corollary of self-determination of peoples)?

  • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    How about Cuba’s sovereign right to host as many nuclear weapons and missiles as it God damn wants?

the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
lock
Community locked: only moderators can create posts. You can still comment on posts.

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2 users / day
  • 10 users / week
  • 31 users / month
  • 136 users / 6 months
  • 6 local subscribers
  • 16K subscribers
  • 5.12K Posts
  • 135K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • KiaKaha [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • MiraculousMM [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
  • corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]@hexbear.net
  • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • replaceable [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • CARCOSA [mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.net
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org