Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youāll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post ā thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Decemberās finally arrived, and the run-up to Christmas has begun. Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)
Another day, another instance of rationalists struggling to comprehend how theyāve been played by the LLM companies: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/5aKRshJzhojqfbRyo/unless-its-governance-changes-anthropic-is-untrustworthy
A very long, detailed post, elaborating very extensively the many ways Anthropic has played the AI doomers, promising AI safety but behaving like all the other frontier LLM companies, including blocking any and all regulation. The top responses are all tone policing and such denying it in a half-assed way that doesnāt really engage with the fact the Anthropic has lied and broken āAI safety commitmentsā to rationalist/lesswrongers/EA shamelessly and repeatedly:
I feel confused about how to engage with this post. I agree that thereās a bunch of evidence here that Anthropic has done various shady things, which I do think should be collected in one place. On the other hand, I keep seeing aggressive critiques from Mikhail that I think are low-quality (more context below), and I expect that a bunch of this post is āspunā in uncharitable ways.
I think itās sort of a type error to refer to Anthropic as something that one could trust or not. Anthropic is a company which has a bunch of executives, employees, board members, LTBT members, external contractors, investors, etc, all of whom have influence over different things the company does.
I would find this all hilarious, except a lot of the regulation and some of the āAI safety commitmentsā would also address real ethical concerns.
If rationalists could benefit from just one piece of advice, it would be: actions speak louder than words. Right now, I donāt think they understand that, given their penchant for 10k word blog posts.
One non-AI example of this is the most expensive fireworks show in history, I mean, the SpaceX Starship program. So far, they have had 11 or 12 test flights (I donāt care to count the exact number by this point), and not a single one of them has delivered anything into orbit. Fans generally tend to cling on to a few parlor tricks like the āchopstickā stuff. They seem to have forgotten that their goal was to land people on the moon. This goal had already been accomplished over 50 years ago with the 11th flight of the Apollo program.
I saw this coming from their very first Starship test flight. They destroyed the launchpad as soon as the rocket lifted off, with massive chunks of concrete flying hundreds of feet into the air. The rocket itself lost control and exploded 4 minutes later. But by far the most damning part was when the camera cut to the SpaceX employees wildly cheering. Later on there were countless spin articles about how this test flight was successful because they collected so much data.
I chose to believe the evidence in front of my eyes over the talking points about how SpaceX was decades ahead of everyone else, SpaceX is a leader in cheap reusable spacecraft, iterative development is great, etc. Now, I choose to look at the actions of the AI companies, and I can easily see that they do not have any ethics. Meanwhile, the rationalists are hypnotized by the Anthropic critihype blog posts about how their AI is dangerous.
I chose to believe the evidence in front of my eyes over the talking points about how SpaceX was decades ahead of everyone else, SpaceX is a leader in cheap reusable spacecraft, iterative development is great, etc.
I suspect that part of the problem is that there is company in there thatās doing a pretty amazing job of reusable rocketry at lower prices than everyone else under the guidance of a skilled leader who is also technically competent, except that leader is gwynne shotwell who is ultimately beholden to an idiot manchild who wants his flying cybertruck just the way he imagines it, and cannot be gainsayed.
This would be worrying if there was any risk at all that the stuff Anthropic is pumping out is an existential threat to humanity. There isnāt so this is just rats learning how the world works outside the blog bubble.
I mean, I assume the bigger the pump the bubble the bigger the burst, but at this point the rationalists arenāt really so relevant anymore, they served their role in early incubation.
Bay Area rationalist Sam Kirchner, cofounder of the Berkeley āStop AIā group, claims ānonviolence isnāt working anymoreā and goes off the grid. Hasnāt been heard from in weeks.
Article has some quotes from Emile Torres.
Jesus, it could be like the Zizians all over again. These guys are all such fucking clowns right up until they very much are not.
Yudās whole project is a pipeline intended to create zizians, if you believe that Yud is serious about his alignment beliefs. If he isnāt serious then itās just an unfortunate consequence that he is not trying to address in any meaningful way.
fortunately, yud clarified everything in his recent post concerning the zizians, which indicated thatā¦ uh, hmm, that we should use a prediction market to determine whether itās moral to sell LSD to children. maybe he got off track a little
to
fucksell LSD to children
A belief system that inculates the believer into thinking that the work is the most important duty a human can perform, while also isolating them behind impenetrable pseudo-intellectual esoterica, while also funneling them into economic precarityā¦ sounds like a recipe for
delicious browniestrouble.Growing up in Alabama, I didnāt have the vocabulary to express it, but I definitely had the feeling when meeting some people, āGiven the bullshit you alreasy buy, there is nothing in principle stopping you from going full fash.ā I get the same feeling now from Yuddites: āThere is nothing in principle stopping you from going full Zizian.ā
the real x-factor was the terror clowns we made along the way.
Bayesian Clown Posse
robots gonna make us Faygo, better stab a data center and by data center I mean land lord who had nothing to do with AI shit.
Whoop whoop
Banger
just one rationalist got lost in the wilderness? thatās nothing, tell me when all of them are gone
The concern is that theyāre not ālost in the wildernessā but rather are going to turn up in the vicinity of some newly dead people.
look some people just donāt like women having hobbies
Is it better for these people to be collected in one place under the singularity cult, or dispersed into all the other religions, cults, and conspiracy theories that they would ordinarily be pulled into?
Most insane part about this is after he assaulted the treasurer(?) of his foundation trying to siphon funds for an apparent terror act, the naive chuckle fucks still went and said āwe dont think his violent tendencies are an indication he might do something violentā
Like idk maybe update on the fact he just sent one of his own to the hospital??
hi please hate this article headline with me
If TCP/IP stack had feelings, it would have a great reason to feel insulted.
hi hi I am budweiser jabrony please join my new famous and good website ātapering incorrectness dot comā where we speculate about which OSI layers have the most consciousness (zero is not a valid amount of consciousness) also give money and prima nocta. thanks
Tcp/ip knew what it did, with its authoritarian desire to see packets in order. Reject authority embrace UDP!
But yes, they are using ālayerā wrong
Well that and ācoreā. I could consider social media and even chatbots parts of internet infrastructure, but they both depend on a framework of underlying protocols and their implementation details. Without social media or chatbots the internet would still be the internet, which is not the case for, say, the Internet Protocol.
Also I would contend theyāre misusing āinfrastructureā. Social media and chat bots are kinds of services that are provided over the internet, but they arenāt a part of the infrastructure itself anymore than the worldās largest ball of twine is part of the infrastructure of the Interstate Highway System.
Heh yeah, āinfrastructureā in the same way that moneyed bayfuckers are ābuildersā
It is also a useful study in just how little they fucking by get about how anything works, and what models of reasoning they apply to what they perceive. Depressing, but useful
It legitimately feels like at least half of these jokers have the same attitude towards IT and project management that sovereign citizens do to the law. SovCits donāt understand the law as a coherent series of rules and principles applied through established procedures etc, they just see a bunch of people who say magic words that they donāt entirely understand and file weird paperwork that doesnāt make sense and then end up getting given a bunch of money or going to prison or whatever. Itās a literal cargo cult version of the legal system, with the slight hiccup that the rest of the world is trying to actually function.
Similarly, the Silicon Valley Business Idiot set sees the tech industry as one where people say the right things and make the buttons look pretty and sometimes they get bestowed reality-warping sums of money. The financial system is sufficiently divorced from reality that the market doesnāt punish the SVBIs for their cargo cult understanding of technology, but this does explain a lot of the discourse and the way people like Thiel, Andreesen, and Altman talk about their work and why the actual products are so shite to use.
Yeah, it is just a part of the application layer, and not even the whole one.
Ah but, you see, the end goal of the internet is serving slop and ads
They somehow misused every word in that sentence.
Chicken penne is now rivaling spaghetti Bolognese as a core layer of pasta infrastructure.
please hate this article headline with me
Iām right there with you
the article headline: āChatbots are now rivaling social networks as a core layer of internet infrastructureā
Counterpoint: āvibe codingā is rotting internet infrastructure from the inside, AI scrapers are destroying the commons through large-scale theft, chatbots are drowning everything else through nonstop lying
The real infrastructure is the friends we made along the way
something i was thinking about yesterday: so many people i
respectused to respect have admitted to using llms as a search engine. even after i explain the seven problems with using a chatbot this way:- wrong tool for the job
- bad tool
- are you fucking serious?
- environmental impact
- ethics of how the data was gathered/curated to generate[1] the model
- privacy policy of these companies is a nightmare
- seriously what is wrong with you
they continue to do it. the ease of use, together with the valid syntax output by the llm, seems to short-circuit something in the end-userās brain.
anyway, in the same way that some vibe-coded bullshit will end up exploding down the line, i wonder whether the use of llms as a search engine is going to have some similar unintended consequences ā āoh, yeah, sorry boss, the ai told me that mr. robot was pretty accurate, idk why all of our secrets got leaked. i watched the entire series.ā
additionally, i wonder about the timing. will we see sporadic incidents of shit exploding, or will there be a cascade of chickens coming home to roost?
they call this ātrainingā but i try to avoid anthropomorphising chatbots ā©ļø
Yes i know the kid in the omelas hole gets tortured each time i use the woe engine to generate an email. Is that bad?
Is there any search engine that isnāt pushing an āAI modeā of sorts? Some are more sneaky or give option to āopt outā like duckduckgo, but this all feels temporary until it is the only option.
I have found it strange how many people will say āI asked chatgptā with the same normalcy as āgooglingā was.
Sadly web search, and the web in general, have enshittified so much that asking ChatGPT can be a much more reliable and quicker way to find information. I donāt excuse it for anything that you could easily find on wikipedia, but itās useful for queries such as āwhatās the name of that free indie game from the 00s that was just a boss rush no you fucking idiot not any of this shit it was a game maker thing with retro pixel style or whatever ughā where web search is utterly useless. Itās a frustrating situation, because of course in an ideal world chatbots donāt exist and information on the web is not drowned in a sea of predatory bullshit, reliable web indexes and directories exist and you can easily ask other people on non-predatory platforms. In the meanwhile I donāt want to blame the average (non-tech-evangelist, non-responsibility-having) user for being funnelled into this crap. At worst theyāre victims like all of us.
Oh yeah and the gameās Banana Nababa by the way.
At work, i watched my boss google something, see the āai overviewā and then say āwho knows if this is rightā, and then read it and then close the tab.
It made me think about how this is how like a rumor or something happens. Even in a good case, they read the text with some scepticism but then 2 days later they forgot where they heard it and so they say they think whatever it was is right.
āthey call this ātrainingā but i try to avoid anthropomorphising chatbotsā
You can train animals, you can train a plant, you can train your hair. So itās not really anthropomorphising.
This looks like itās relevant to our interests
Hayekās Bastards: Race, Gold, IQ, and the Capitalism of the Far Right by Quinn Slobodian
https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9781890951917/hayeks-bastards
He came by campus last spring and did a reading, very solid and surprisingly well-attended talk.
Always thought she should have stuck to acting.
(I know, Hayek just always reminds me of how people put his quotes over Hayeks image, and people just get really mad at her, and not at him. Always wonder if people would have been just as mad if it was Friedrichs image and not Salmas due to the sexism aspect).
Cory Doctorow has plugged this on his blog, which is usually a good signal for me.
anyone else spent their saturday looking for gas turbine datasheets? no?
anyway, the bad, no good, haphazard power engineering of crusoe
neoclouds on top of silicon need a lot of power that they canāt get because they canāt get substation big enough, or maybe provider denied it, so they decided that homemade is just as fine. in order to turn some kind of fuel (could be methane, or maybe not, who knows) into electricity they need gas turbines and a couple of weeks back there was a story that crusoe got their first aeroderivative gas turbines from GE https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/data-centers-turn-to-ex-airliner-engines-as-ai-power-crunch-bites this means that these are old, refurbished, modified jet engines put in a chassis with generator and with turbofan removed. in total they booked 29 turbines from GE, LM2500 series, and some other, PE6000 from other company called proenergy* and probably others (?) for alleged 4.5GW total. for neoclouds generators of this type have major advantage that 1. they exist and backlog isnāt horrific, the first ones delivered were contracted in december 2024, so about 10 months, and onsite construction is limited (sometimes less than month) 2. these things are compact and reasonably powerful, can be loaded on trailer in parts and just delivered wherever 3. at the same time these are small enough that piecewise installation is reasonable (34.4MW per, so just from GE 1GW total spread across 29)
and thatās about it from advantages. these choices are fucking weird really. the state of the art in turning gas to electricity is to first, take as big gas turbine as practical, which might be 100MW, 350MW, there are even bigger ones. this is because efficiency of gas turbines increases with size, because big part of losses comes from gas slipping through the gap between blades and stator/rotor. the bigger turbine, the bigger cross-sectional area occupied by blades (~ r^2), and so gap (~ r) is less important. this effect is responsible for differences in efficiency of couple of percent just for gas turbine, for example for GE, aeroderivative 35MW-ish turbine (LM2500) weāre looking at 39.8% efficiency, while another GE aeroderivative turbine (LMS100) at 115MW has 43.9% efficiency. our neocloud disruptors stop there, with their just under 40% efficient turbines (and probably lower*) while exhaust is well over 500C and can be used to boil water, which is what any serious powerplant does in combined cycle. this additional steam turbine gives about third of total generated energy, bringing total efficiency to some 60-63%.
so right off the bat, crusoe throws away about third of usable energy, or alternatively for the same amount of power they burn 50-70% more gas, if they even use gas and not for example diesel. they specifically didnāt order turbines with this extra heat recovery mechanism, because, based on datasheet https://www.gevernova.com/content/dam/gepower-new/global/en_US/downloads/gas-new-site/products/gas-turbines/gev-aero-fact-sheets/GEA35746-GEV-LM2500XPRESS-Product-Factsheet.pdf they would get over 1.37GW, while GE press announcement talked about ājust under 1GWā which matches only with the oldest type of turbine there (guess: cheapest), or maybe some mix with even older ones than what is shown. this is not what serious power generating business would do, because for them every fraction of percent matters. while it might be possible to get heat recovery steam boiler and steam turbine units there later, this means extra installation time (capex per MW turns out to be similar) and more backlog, and requires more planning and real estate and foresight, and if they had that they wouldnāt be there in the first place, would they. even then, efficiencies get to maybe 55% because turns out that these heat exchangers required for for professional stuff are huge and canāt be loaded on trailer, so they have to go with less
so it sorta gets them power short term, and financially it doesnāt look well long term, but maybe they know that and donāt care because they know they wonāt be there to pay bills for gas, but also if these glorified gensets are only used during outages or otherwise not to their full capacity then it doesnāt matter that much. also gas turbines in order to run efficiently need to run hot, but the hottest possible temperature with normal fuels would melt any material we can make blades of, so the solution is to take double or triple amount of air than needed and dilute hot gases this way, which also means these are perfect conditions for nitric oxide synthesis, which means smog downwind. now there are SCRs which are supposed to deal with it, but it didnāt stop musk from poisoning people of memphis when he did very similar thing
* proenergy takes the same jet engine that GE does and turns it into PE6000, which is probably mostly the same stuff as LM6000, except that GE version is 51MW and proenergy 48MW. i donāt know whether itās derated or less efficient still, but for the same gas consumption it would be 37.5%
Youād think that theyād eventually run out of ways to say āfuck you, got mineā but here we are I guess. Iām going to guess that theyāre not subject to the same kinds of environmental regulations or whatever that an actual power plant would be because itās not connected to the grid?
why wouldnāt they be subject to emission controls if theyāre islanded? anyway they arenāt islanded, theyāre using gas turbines to supplement what they can draw from substation or the other way around, either way itās probably all synchronized and connected, they just put these turbines behind the meter
i guess theyāre not subject to emission controls because theyāre in texas and anything green is woke, so they might just not do any of that and vent all the carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides these things belch. also, no surprises if they fold before emaciated epa gets to them, if republicans donāt prevent it outright that is
welcome to the abyss, it sucks here
i mostly meant to point out that it looks like they prioritized delivery speed and minimum construction, while paying top dollar for extra 50-70% fuel so it makes sense short term, and who cares what comes in two years when theyāre under. this also means they bought out all gas turbines money can buy. if marine diesels werenāt so heavy these would be next
Dexerto has reported on an unnamed Japanese game studio weeding out promptfondlers (by having applicants draw something in-person during interviews).
Unsurprisingly, the replies have become a promptfondler shooting gallery. Personal āfavouriteā goes to the guy who casually admits he canāt tell art from slop:
The follow-up is also funny:
image description
quote post from same poster: āGrok fixed it for me:ā
quoted post: āPeople were hating on Geminiās floor plan, so I asked Grok to make it more practical.ā
An AI slop picture of a house floorplan at the top melding into a perspective drawing of a room interior below.
Help, I asked AI to design my bathroom and it came with this, does anyone know where I can find that wallpaper?
I guess my P(Doom|Bathroom) should have been higher.
Hang on Iāve been trying to create a whole house for this joke and I could have just used the bathroom?
I donāt see the problem, that looks like a typical McMansion to me.
Also, itās nice the AI included a dedicated room for snorting cocaine (powder room).
deleted by creator
Apparently we are part of the rising trend of AI denialism
Author Louis Rosenberg is āan engineer, researcher, inventor, and entrepreneurā according to his PR-stinking Wikipage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_B._Rosenberg. I am sure he is utterly impartial and fair with regards to AI.
i hereby propose a new metric for a popular publication, the epstein number (Ä), denoting the number of authors who took flights to epsteinās rape island. generally, credible publications should have
Ä=0. this one, after a very quick look, hasÄ=2, and also hosts sabine hossenfelder.Absolutely savage 10/10 no notes
itās some copium of tremendous potency to misidentify public sentiment (https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2025/04/03/how-the-us-public-and-ai-experts-view-artificial-intelligence/) for movement (ignore the āAI expertsā these are people surveyed at a certain machine learning conference, really could be substituted by 1000 clones of Sutskever)
Computer scientist Louis Rosenberg argues that dismissing AI as a ābubbleā or mere āslopā overlooks the tectonic technological shift thatās reshaping society.
āPlease stop talking about the bubble bursting, I havenāt handed off my bag yetā
We are three paragraphs and one subheading down before we hit an Ayn Rand quote. This clearly bodes well.
A couple paragraphs later weāre ignoring both the obvious philosophical discussion about creativity and the more immediate argument about why this technology is being forced on us so aggressively. As much as Iād love to rant about this I got distracted by the next bit talking about how micro expressions will let LLMs decode emotions and whatever. Iād love to know this guyās thoughts on that AI-powered phrenologist features a couple weeks ago.
More grok shit: https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/grok-doxxing it in contrast to most other models, is very good at doxing people.
Amazing how everything Musk makes is the worst in class (and somehow the Rationalists think he will be their saviour (that is because he is a eugenicist)).
(thinks) groxxing
the base use for LLMs is gonna be hypertargetted advertising, malware, political propaganda etc
well the base case for LLMs is that, right now
the privacy nerds wonāt know what hit them
(e, cw: genocide and culturally-targeted hate by the felon bot)
worldās most divorced man continues outperforming black holes at sucking
404 also recently did a piece on his ego-maintenance society-destroying vainglory projects
imagine what itās like in his head. era-defining levels of vacuous.
From the replies
I wonder what prompted it to switch to Elon being worth less than the average human while simultaneously saying itād vaporize millions if it could prolonged his life in a different sub-thread
Itās odd to me that people still expect any consistency from chatbots. These bots can and will give different answers to the same verbatim question. Am I just too online if I have involuntarily encountered enough AI output to know this?
From Lila Byock:
A 4th grader was assigned to design a book cover for Pippi Longstocking using Adobe for Education.
The result is, in technical terms, four pictures of a schoolgirl waifu in fetishwear.
The result is, in technical terms, four pictures of a schoolgirl waifu in fetishwear.
I try to avoid having to even see the outputs of these fucking systems, but you just made me realize that thereās going to be more than a few of them that will āleakā (read: preferentially deliver, by way of training focus) the kinks of its particular owner. I mean itās already happening for the textual replies on twitter, soothing felonās ever so bruised ego. the chance of it not Shipping beyond that is pretty damn zero :|
god I hate all of this
/r/SneerClub discusses MIRI financials and how Yud ended up getting paid $600K per year from their cache.
Malo Bourgon, MIRI CEO, makes a cameo in the comments to discuss Zizās claims about SA payoffs and how he thinks Yudās salary (the equivalent of like 150.000 malaria vaccines) is defensible for reasons that definitely exist, but they live in Canada, you canāt see them.
Guy does a terrible job explaining literally anything. Why, when trying to explain all the SA based drama, does he choose to create an analogy where the former employee is heavily implied to have murdered his wife?
S/o to cinnaverses for mixing it up in there.
āNah, salary stuff is privateā, starting to think this sort of stuff is an idea introduced to protect capital and nobody else.
I was teasing this out in my head to try come up with a good sneer. First thought: for an organisation that tries to appeal to EAs, youād think that they would do a good job of being transparent about why so much money is being spent on someone with such low output. But immediate rebuttal: the whole point of the TESCREAL cult shit is that yud get free tuocs because heās the chosen one to solve alignment.
Was thinking more about how the radical, dont fall to biasses think for yourself and cone here to really learn to think (so we can stop the paperclipmachine and resurrect the dead) defend a half million dollars salary with a āthats privateā.
But that is the same conclusion. The prophet must be protected.
Cinnas
The Rolling Stone article is a bit odd (it appears to tell the story of the ex-employee who created Miricult twice, the first time without names and the second naming the accuser) but I trust them that MIRI did pay the accuser. Rolling Stone are a serious news organization which can be sued.
Yeah, I think Rolling Stone was worried about getting sued and omitted Helmās name in the first draft (or something like that).
I know who the alleged victim was, and I think there probably was a crime and blackmail payments but the alleged victim didnāt want to come forward for a number of reasons (among other things, heās still part of the rationalist community and has faced a lot of harassment from the public after an unrelated newspaper article outed him as being trans). Iād also point out that the only person that miricult directly accused of statutory rape was one of Yudkowskyās employees rather than Yudkowsky himself. That being said, the journalist who wrote the Rolling Stone article claims she got a copy of the police report Helm filed and only Yudkowsky was named.
Even if miricult was total bullshit Iām confident that the alleged victim was lying about not being exploited by other rationalists; a few years later he and a couple of other people posted accounts of being sexually abused by a rationalist (unrelated to miricult) and it led to the abuser being ostracized from the rationalist community.
Anyways I know a lot more about this but Iād rather not discuss the details on a publicly viewable forum to protect the privacy of the people involved.
I agree that its gross to discuss a lot of this in public, and that underage sex is often an ethical grey area. I had no idea that the person who accused BD of pushing him into substance use and extreme BDSM scenarios is also the person who allegedly had sex underage with a MIRI staffer while living in a Rationalist group home.
Zizās blog had posts that revealed his identity and mentioned some of the BD stuff, once I found them it was just a matter of putting two and two together, so to speak
Damn, I missed this and now the comment is deleted. Do you happen to remember what he said?
I believe he was trying to explain why it looked like MIRI had paid money out to an alleged sexual abuser. The analogy was constructed something like this:
- A and B work at a company C
- A has conflict with B.
- C decides to fire B.
- unrelated to 1, 2, or 3, B has a wife D, who dies in mysterious circumstances, leading A to strongly believe that B killed D.
- The police, E, perform an investigation and decide not to pursue a case against B
- C pays out Bās severance, unrelated to 2, 4, or 5.
Donāt blame me or how I remembered this if this doesnāt make sense.
Additionally he said something to the effect of I donāt blame you for not knowing this, it wasnāt effectively communicated to the media like itās no big deal, which isnāt really helping to beat the allegations of donāt ask donāt tell policies about SA in rat related orgs.
Can confirm. This was like if the pope walked into an r/atheism meetup and showed his texts saying ādw bro, Iāll just move you to a different diocese, btw this totally isnāt about the allegations wink winkā
Etymology Nerd has a really good point about accelerationists, connects them to religion
I like this. Kinda wish it was either 10x longer and explained things a bit, or 10x shorter and was more shitposty. Still, good
