• gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 days ago

    PSA: before the advent of organized labor, workers would often negotiate with tactics such as “be fair to us, or we’ll break your kneecaps and burn your fucking factory down”.

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah but they’ll hide behind their corporation so there’s no “person” to throw in prison.

        Corporations aren’t people no matter what the supreme court says

  • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sorry boss. I don’t die for nobody. Oh you want to fire me? I’m sure the Department of Labor and OSHA would love to hear about how you forced us to stay in a dangerous environment under threat of termination. I’m sure that’ll end super swell for you.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      7 days ago

      Sadly, it might end just fine for the boss. The employee would be better off going to the press first.

      • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not arguing, but how? How would this not be a slam dunk for a labor law lawyer? The law is pretty clear on prohibiting threats of termination in the face of danger.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Song along with me!

        🎵 It always will end up fine… When you’re rich! When it’s capitalism controlling the ship! 🎵

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      You are correct but you have to survive not being paid long enough to win the court case. Sometimes even when people know their rights they are living paycheck to paycheck and cannot risk being fired.

        • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 days ago

          For some families, that’s the reality, not being paid means no housing, no food, no medications. For people who have dangerous debt, not having available money could be a threat to their life.

          Obviously your life is priceless, but we’ve developed a system where you simply can’t live without money, and put people in circumstances where the money in their hand now is worthy more to their survival today than twice as much money in their hand tomorrow.

          I’m just grateful that’s not my situation.

          • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Right, but if you die, your family might only see the life insurance settlement from your workplace group insurance. They won’t see any further benefits and they lose a family member. There is nothing to gain and everything to lose by putting yourself in harm’s way to appease your employer who is acting unlawfully.

            • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              That’s a windfall payment and one less mouth to feed in the long run. Morbid, Yes, it’s not the best long term solution but anything you can do to survive true poverty never is.

              What’s to say losing your job doesn’t have 3 of you dying from exposure in your car a week after you’re evicted?

              If you haven’t lived the trauma of life and death poverty, I’m glad, but I don’t think it’s something that can be fully explained.

              Trauma changes the way your brain processes risk, people living in chronic poverty don’t have the same risk assessment framework as you.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The part of your workday that you’re most likely to die during is your commute, especially if you drive, which is not covered by DoL or OSHA.

      ETA: Okay, if you’re a crab fisherman or salvage diver maybe your job is more dangerous. But for almost every job I can think of driving to work is more dangerous than everything you do.

      • Unboxious@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        The part of your workday that you’re most likely to die during is your commute, especially if you drive, which is not covered by DoL or OSHA.

        FWIW this is because of DoL and OSHA making sure that once you get to work they have to keep you reasonably safe. This was not always the case in the past.

      • raynethackery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        In my state, as long as you don’t make any stops between home and work, you are covered by workers compensation.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’m glad to hear that. It’s at least something.

          Every time I hear about a fatal crash during rush hour I feel terrible for the person who died going to work.

      • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Your comment doesn’t really address my point. I’m talking about people who died at work who were threatened with termination if they attempted to leave a dangerous work environment.

  • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    7 days ago

    Charge the manager with a separate count of murder for every employee that died due to their orders.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      7 days ago

      In old Japan, they would have made a bunch of management chop their finger off or commit seppuku.

      Im not suggesting that. I’m just saying.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      7 days ago

      Murder wouldnt stick, have to prove intent.

      Negligent Homicide or Criminal Negligence on the other hand…

      • Krono@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        TN has a strong felony murder statute. You dont need to prove intent, you just need to prove they were perpetrating a related violent felony.

        I’m not a lawyer but in this case it seems like management have probably met the criteria for felony theft or kidnapping. Any properly motivated DA could then add a felony murder charge for each death.

        • Delphia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          It doesnt meet the criteria for murder.

          Section 1751(a) of Title 18 incorporates by reference 18 U.S.C. §§ 1111 and 1112. 18 U.S.C. § 1111 defines murder as the unlawful killing of a human being with malice, and divides it into two degrees. Murder in the first degree is punishable by death.

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Man if it’s a state of emergency let the mgr sink with the ship.

    It so sad, they probably complied because they needed their jobs.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well on the bright side at least now they don’t? I hope their families sue the shit out of the company and the manager.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    7 days ago

    I worked at a major destination-store focused on fishing and hunting products.

    We had a hurricane hitting and the manager on duty made it clear that anyone going home to help out their families would be fired. Then when he got the call that water was rising near his house, he took off.

    I’ve never hated a manager more than in that moment. When I was in management later, I made sure that I took all the shitty holiday shifts so my staff didn’t have to work until 10pm on Christmas Eve and then be back in the building changing prices for the after-Christmas sale at 2am on the 26th.

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        7 days ago

        And very literally after it was too late to safely leave.

        Which means, by definition, they were not dismissed while they could safely leave.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          7 days ago

          “After the parking lot filled with water and the power went out, they were dismissed. For some reason they hung around??? It’s peculiar that they chose to stay in a building after they were dismissed into the floodwaters.”

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    Didn’t the triangle waistshirt fire happen because the employers were fucking assholes and locked the fire escapes? This is like that, but with water instead of fire.

  • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I hope their productivity wasn’t impeded by this minor inconvenience. I’d hate it if their dying led to their employer making marginally less money. So rude of them.

    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Heh? I don’t get it. What are you trying to say here? Where do you think government mo ey to invest in flood protections come from? Taxes…?

      • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I believe it’s a parody of the people that will gab any nonsense to rail against taxes.

        Besides, from the income of putting prisoners to work obviously.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    The worst part is the Trump appointed SCOTUS basically made this legal to do.

    EDIT: This comment of mine was misleading and unfair. Neil Gorsuch was not on the SCOTUS when he decided a truck driver forfeit his job without means of legal recourse by choosing to abandon his trailer and prevent death from Hypothermia.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        In the article and the after statement from the company it seems that a lot of employees left earlier but the ones that stayed were non native English speaking immigrants that paid with their lives to be cheap labor and are being represented by a refugee and immigration group in the area for their deaths.

        So not loyal but those trapped to the company that held power over them. As you would expect of people that need the job to stay and allows for the company to have absolute power over their workers like they want.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yeah. I mean people that are excellent workers cause they are cheap. Can be told to pay their own way to training themselves and will do it because they are desperate. Able to be deported to a country where they won’t have have any legal discourse for any reason so they won’t complain and take what they can get, or else lose their money, the cost of paying to get here and potentially their family.

            So, yeah I mean. No wonder anyone with a business loves them.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Meanwhile, at my workplace, we had to evacuate over the possibility of roads flooding in a tropical storm.

    I thought this kind of nonsense was a thing of the past.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Honestly, in the course of our species living in servitude to a few thousand sociopaths who’ve used their capital/power to convince us that meaningless productivity for toxic economic metasisis is “the only way forward” and the meaning of life, I’ve come to realize their terraforming of our only habitat against our physically fragile species in their blind, reckless pursuit of ever moar is a purely accidental mercy.

    Extinction is far preferable to generation after generation sacrificing themselves from cradle to grave solely to enrich our modern pharoahs of avarice and their nepo progeny without end. Sometimes extinct is better.

    You’re free to disagree, of course, but better to see the silver lining in what our species is quite literally dead set to do and well into accomplishing. Im just glad greed caused climate change won’t permit this torturous, exploitative civilization to continue for more than another half century or so.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      There are some studies that say the Sahara desert is actually the result of mass farming goats in the area that removed so much of the vegetation it started a cascading effect of desertification.

      We have a long history of fucking up the planet for reasons that are silly in hindsight that leaves scars that literally affect the future of the planet. Unfortunately I don’t think there will ever be a swift and merciful end but one that drags out so don’t go praising the suffering to come yet.

  • Zip2@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Do employers not have a duty of care to their employees over there?

    Or the word “twice”?