• zephiriz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I don’t know how true this is, or if it’s just a funny story. Years ago even before gay marriage even became a topic in mainstream media. I heard that a trans fem went to go get her ID changed from M to F. They refused to change it all the typical response. She got mad and well if they see me as M then I’ll dress like one. She took her top off and would walk around town topless. Cops would arrest her or try to write her tickets but she would go into Court and go my ID says M and men can walk around without a shirt, so what’s the problem. I think they eventually let her change her ID to F.

    Again I don’t know if this is true just a funny story I heard a long time ago. Though it would be funny if it would happen today.

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    And notice how they gave NO GRACE PERIOD for them whatsoever to cause as much pain and suffering. You can’t drive, you can’t buy alcohol, tobacco, etc. This goes to show what happens when hateful racists run the entire government and need a minority group to attack and blame everything on.

    Remember to vote people, this is why voting is so important.

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Better keep picking on less than 1% of the population instead of trying to solve the problems effecting everyone.

    • zephiriz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I would say they have us focusing on the wrong 1%. We should unite and go after the real problem.

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’re intentionally focusing on the wrong 1%. Going after trans people is meant to serve as a distraction.

  • Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is so fucked up on so many levels. Next step will be trying to erase trans people from being able to go outside or have a job. I’m surprised Kansas lawmakers just didn’t go ahead and make all trans people sew a pink triangle to everything they wear.

    • Emerald (she/her)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Next step will be trying to erase trans people from being able to go outside or have a job

      Kansas, like most all of the USA is very car dependent so losing a drivers license could result in not being able to commute to a job

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      As terrible as it is, then notice does say that you will be given a replacement license when you hand in the current one. So it’s not like they won’t be able to drive.

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        My girlfriend is trans. She doesn’t look ANYTHING like a man. In a few months she won’t even have a penis. But if she had to go through this and have her license say M on it, anyone reading it will be extremely confused.

          • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Because if she lived in Kansas, in a few months she won’t have any external male parts whatsoever, and if she had to put an M on her license it wouldn’t even make sense.

            I was providing an example of just how utterly stupid this law is.

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m sorry she’s having to deal with this BS. I have a feeling the next step is to arrest her in a pullover for having an invalid license when the cop doesn’t believe the M instead of the F and says it’s fake. Or when she tries to go to a bar and gets told its fake.

              • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 days ago

                She’s (I say this with a massive amount of sigh) fortunately in Ohio, so doesn’t have to deal with this. I’m still working on seeing if she can file for refugee status here in Canada and she can move here.

                But what you are saying is 100% part of the point. Make trans people’s licenses look like they’re fake. A trans male who looks more dude than me, a cis man, with an F on his license might get more harassed about it, arrested, etc. The cruelty is the point. The right knows they can’t just make being trans illegal. But they can sure work their way towards it slowly. And this is just another step towards it.

                First they came for.

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Definitely, all I’m saying is that she will still have a license and still will be able to drive.

          • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Except now her license would have an M on it, even thought she looks completely like a woman. Driving isn’t the issue here. Anywhere that checks ID like bars, liquor stores, anywhere would now see her license, see an M, look at her, and think it’s either fake, or outing her publicly as trans.

            This is now a frightening reality for any trans person in Kentucky.

            • dev_null@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Oh, yeah that’s a problem. I didn’t even consider using driver licenses as an ID, I’m used to having a national ID and forgot people use their driver’s license as an ID in the US.

              I don’t even have a driver’s license because I never needed a car, public transport was great in all the cities in Europe where I lived.I’m probably very divorced from the US realities.

  • mcv@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “We apologize for the inconvenience this causes you.”

    How nice.

    “We apologize for the fact that you live under a state legislature that doesn’t respect your humanity.”

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      With a zero day grace period to get things changed, they don’t apologize for anything, not even in a veiled way.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nah. This isn’t that. It’s bullshit, it’s unnecessarily cruel, but “get a new ID with the M or F switched to the one you don’t identify with” isn’t all that relevant to SAVE when either way that ID alone wouldn’t qualify as documentary proof of United States citizenship per SAVE. If you’re already taking time out to go to the DMV though, you may as well get what you were already going to need to meet SAVE while you’re out and dealing with government bureaucrats. See this as an excuse to get the other sorted too.

      Seriously though, everyone needs to read SAVE and ensure you have what you need. Do it now, don’t wait until the election. Don’t even wait until SAVE passes. Be prepared for what they want to pull before they succeed at pulling it, because after they’re only going to make it harder.

      • Casterial@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, my hope of SAVE is that it’s held up in courts. Elections are a state right managed by the state.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I would hope it would collapse under 24A if nothing else, but I don’t trust our current SCOTUS that far. Best to be prepared for it than to hope it fails.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    What the fuck do the genitals I had at birth have to do with my ability to drive a car?

    • Patrikvo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 days ago

      Republicans are obsessed with genitals. Maybe if we all send them a picture they can get it out of their system and finally grow up.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      something someshit uh trans sports

      these fucks do not understand human rights and won’t stop with their bullshit until they’re voted out of office.

      Unfortunately, Kansastan.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re not going to vote your way out of fascism. Stories are already coming out of how they plan to “take control” of elections.

    • Gal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you read the text in front of you, you’d realize they do not think your gender affects your ability to drive. They just think the license is invalid due to the wrong gender being listed.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why would it invalidate the licence? They were utterly fine with it up until now so what’s changed?

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          They want to fuck with trans people because they hate them. The thing that changed is they feel confident enough to do it now and that no one will act against them.

        • Gal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you had read the subtext you would have realized they are transphobic

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes, obviously. It is worth pointing out the absurdity of every excuse they use to be transphobic.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      136
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      If they try this shit in my state, I’d fucking sue.

      I had surgery BECAUSE it would let me change my drivers license. I paid $5500 as a broke college student because I was getting turned down for jobs with that stupid “F.”

      I don’t understand how any of this is legal. The constitution prohibits “ex post facto” laws - how can you revoke someone’s documentation when they complied with the laws as they were at the time?

      • CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        119
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t understand how any of this is legal

        That’s the thing - It’s not. They don’t give a shit, and the judicial system isn’t doing anything about it

        • CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          2 days ago

          And even if they did, it would take months, if not years, to resolve. Until then people will either be disenfranchised and can’t vote or forced to update their ID’s, which could also take months of paperwork to resolve.

          • TheSporkBomber@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            In which case they sue, and the case gets run up to the ultra Maga supreme court who will of course be fair and impartial in their review before returning a verdict that favors conservatives.

      • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        how any of this is legal. The constitution

        The problem is that you respect and believe in words. The people currently in charge could give two fucks. Ultimately, words only have the power that we give them, so when those in charge ignore the Constitution, then the Contitution has no power.

        I have severe ADHD. It’s funny in a way because when I was younger, I tried to understand the rules of my employers and follow them. And yet I still lost jobs. In part because of issues related to ADHD specifically, but in part because what companies SAY the rules are is not what the rules are. If you’ve worked in a corporate environment, you know that there’s go-to people for things. And while there’s official processes (or maybe even not), what ACTUALLY happens is that someone goes to the person who can do something and asks them to do it, and generally they do, and that’s like 75% of how business actually runs.

        In the same way, there are rules and decorum and traditions in politics and revolve around the Constution and various bodies of legislature, et cetera. And so there’s nothing that ACTUALLY forces anyone to follow any of that except voluntary compliance or physical threat because policing bodies enforce things.

        This is why the rich are free, largely, from most crimes. They aren’t enforced. And this is how our democracy crumbled. The Constitution hasn’t been repealed. It doesn’t have to be. It is simply ignored. Worse, those who claim to follow it shit on it and ignore it and throw it out.

        • Jännät@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          or physical threat because policing bodies enforce things.

          And unfortunately those kinds of organisations are full of people who tend to lean very heavily towards authoritarianism, so once the winds shift enough you’ll suddenly find that the people who are supposed to be enforcing the law, well, don’t.

            • Jännät@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah the US is pretty much a case study.

              Europe isn’t immune either, by any means. The monopoly on violence will, unsurprisingly, be full of violent authoritarians, and the same will happen anywhere that authoritarians feel like they now have the upper hand

              • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Europe isn’t immune either, by any means.

                Feel rare to hear that expressed, but one of the side effects of our fall into fascism is that, like you say - we make for a good case study, and if it woke Europeans up a bit and that fall doesn’t happen over there, so much the better.

                It definitely is a reminder that we cannot take democracy for granted. It is a constant struggle. And letting the oligarchs “play” with their Fox News lies and right-wing radio… that experiment shows that fascism and authoritarianism must be stamped out and not allowed to thrive as an “equal voice”.

                • Jännät@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  We already have Slovakia, Hungary and Italy here, with Italy being ruled by literal neofascists – FdI is a direct descendant of Mussolini’s original Fascist Party. Finland is on its way to joining them, in Germany AfD is gaining popularity, RN is very popular in France and so on

      • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I’m currently outside the US but I’m pulling my hair out trying to renew my passport. I don’t even care what’s on it. The Nazi bastards don’t give a fuck, the cruelty is the point

        I’ve been trying to revive my childhood passport from my birth country since I fully expect passports to be next

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t understand how any of this is legal

        Part of it comes down to how driving is legally a privilege, but it’s also been made a legal requirement in many instances (such as living on a highway that disallows pedestrians) and a functional requirement in many others (have to walk past 5 miles of parking lots and take a long meandering path to get around the interstate along noisy, busy stroads just to get to any grocery store by foot for the most common example)

        Sometimes in some places there’s half-assed policies in place to try to paper over the problem, such as free paratransit for disabled and elderly individuals that requires scheduling the ride days or weeks in advance, special driving permits for those who had their licenses revoked to be able to get to work, school and go shopping but restricts allowed driving hours and places to make it even more of a punishment, bus services that run only hourly on weekdays, stopping only at poorly marked stops located in built places no human would want to stand at for even a few minutes, etc

      • balsoft@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        The constitution prohibits “ex post facto” laws - how can you revoke someone’s documentation when they complied with the laws as they were at the time?

        I agree with you generally that this should be illegal, but it probably isn’t.

        It definitely isn’t ex post facto; this is not a law that punishes anyone from a legal perspective, it merely changes the requirements for a certain privilege (the ability to drive a vehicle). If it declared these licenses invalid before the date of the law (which could carry punishments for illegally operating vehicles), then it would be ex post facto.

        Another way to put it is that it simply makes a certain action illegal which was previously legal, and laws do that sort of thing all the time. Consider that in the US you didn’t need a driver’s license in order to drive at all until 1913. The NJ law requiring drivers licenses also “revoked” someone’s privilege even though they complied with the laws previously, requiring them to get a permit from then on. But, since it didn’t introduce any punishments for not having the permit before it was introduced, it wasn’t ex post facto.

        Of course the law is also clearly discriminatory, but US’s extremely limited anti-discrimination laws are likely not broad enough to be applied here.

        The current events should awaken many people to the sad fact that US laws and its entire legal system exists primarily to protect the wealthy and the powerful from everyone else; all other functions are secondary. As such, many horrible, immoral, and unjust things are legal under US laws, and many others will be twisted into being legal by the supreme court.

        • disorderly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s true that this isn’t ex post facto, but in a sane interpretation of the law it would be discrimination against a protected class; a woman who was assigned female at birth grts preferential treatment under the law with respect to a woman who was not.

    • Sconrad122@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      3 days ago

      This letter reads to me like it is someone from the Kansas executive branch (run by Democrat Governor Laura Kelly) legitimately apologizing that they are bound by Republican made, veto-overridden law to cause this inconvenience, but maybe I’m being too generous

      • Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 days ago

        That could be the case, I suppose. If they really wanted to be assholes about it, they could just not send anything at all. This at least explains how the recipient is effected and what they can/need to do

      • vortic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s how I read this, too. The government isn’t a monolith that just agrees with every law they have to follow. They do have to follow the law until it is challenged, though. Hopefully courts in KS knock this down.

      • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not only that, but bare in mind that most government employees are there to do a job. They don’t always agree with the laws they have to enforce and sometimes they will make it as challenging as possible for fascist ideas like this go through.

        Complaining to them is like complaining to the checkout cashier at your grocery store that the prices are too high.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nah, this is bipartisan cruelty. The Democratic governor maintained a list of trans people who changed their markers. How do you think they were able to send out these letters so fast? They already had a list of anyone that had changed their gender marker. That list was created on the order of a Democratic governor.

        • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          No. It is GOP cruelty. Nothing “bipartisan” about it. From a different article:

          The new law takes effect on Thursday. Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly vetoed the measure, but the Legislature’s GOP supermajorities overrode it last week as Republican state lawmakers across the U.S. have pursued another round of measures to roll back transgender rights.

          Kansas’ new law enjoyed nearly unanimous GOP support. It is the latest success in what has become an annual effort to further roll back transgender rights by Republicans in statehouses across the U.S., bolstered by policies and rhetoric from President Donald Trump’s administration.

          Kelly supports transgender rights, but GOP lawmakers have overridden her vetoes three of the past four years. (emphases mine)

          Nothing ambiguous about it. I would also draw your attention to the first line of the above letter itself:

          House Substitute for Senate Bill 244, enacted by the Kansas Legislature overriding Governor Kelly’s veto, requires Kansas-issued drivers’ licenses and identification cards to reflect the credential holder’s sex at birth and directs the Division of Vehicles to comply with K.S.A. 77-207.

          Generally speaking, governors do not personally compile healthcare-related lists. Any such list would be assembled by and come through the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, and with the Kansas state GOP supermajority passing the legislation making such lists mandatory, there would not be much the very obviously trans-friendly governor could do.

          The list of trans people Kansas used to send the above letters came from the Kansas Department of Vehicles, which has been compiling a list of trans people since 2007. While it is certainly possible Gov. Kelly had knowledge of the list of trans people compiled by the Kansas Office of Vital Statistics starting in 2019, the Kansas DoV list used to send the recent SB 244 letters was begun and maintained for a dozen years before she took office.

          I genuinely do not see how you can lay GOP group evil at the feet on the one person clearly trying to do what she can to stop it.

          It’s almost like you don’t want the GOP to get full credit for what the GOP supermajority is doing in Kansas to trans people.

          EDITED to correct myself and add source

          • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s almost like you’re completely ignorant of this and are "umm aktually"ing an actual trans person who pays attention to this stuff!

            No shit the law was passed by a Republican legislature. And yes, the law was vetoed by the governor. But maybe you’re just one of those Blue MAGA types that assumes Dems can do no wrong. But a list of trans people in the state already existed. And that list wasn’t created as a result of this law. It was created by policies of the Vital Records office, which the governor controls. In fact, Kansas, with its Democratic governor, had a pre-made list of trans people ready to go, which not even Texas and Florida had!

            https://transitics.substack.com/p/kansas-secretly-spent-years-making

            Whether by malice or ignorance matters little. Under the watch of a Democratic governor, the state went further than any other Republican state in having a records system that could instantly create a list of trans Kansas residents.

            Yes, Republicans are the primary antagonists of trans folks. But Democrats are truthfully not much better. In fact, there are Democratic attorneys general in more than a dozen states that are currently ignoring their own state laws and refusing to enforce anti-discrimination laws. Many hospitals and clinics have been complying in advance with Trump’s illegal executive orders targeting trans healthcare, stopping services for children and adults. Doing so is a direct violation of anti-discrimination laws that LGBT activists spent decades fighting to pass. But the laws mean nothing if the attorneys general aren’t willing to actually enforce them.

            A lot of Democrats have decided that sticking up for trans people is simply politically inconvenient. They won’t actively try to pass persecutory laws, but they won’t lift a finger to fight back against them either. The Kansas governor didn’t want the optics of explicitly signing a piece of bigoted legislation, but she also didn’t lift a finger to protect trans people. The very agencies she’s in charge of designed their records system so that it would be easy to find trans people, and it never occurred to the Democratic governor to try and do something about this.

            So yes, this is bipartisan cruelty. Don’t be Blue MAGA and assume your side is innocent.

            • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              But maybe you’re just one of those Blue MAGA types that assumes Dems can do no wrong.

              Far from it. After Kamala, and the Senate cave-in last year, and all they have NOT done, I’ll never vote non-screamingly progressive Dem again. The Dems are not even remotely sin-free here. And thank you for the additional information; you’re right, I did not know that.

              But it’s not as black and white as you paint it. As tired as you must personally be of not having the supposedly good people do enough, I am tired of seeing people who are actually trying to do the right thing in their given circumstances constantly shat upon for not doing it ALL, while the people most guilty of all these egregious errors get a complete pass, or just a passing nod, as if it is up to the genuinely well-intentioned among us to corral all evil and somehow not up to the evildoers themselves to cut it the fuck out. I don’t know what kind of shit this governor has gotten for her pro-trans actions and vetos, but it’s definitely non-zero in a red state like Kansas, and I would not be surprised if she’s gotten death threats over her pro-trans stance.

              Driving an infinitely fine line between good and perfect helps no one. The governor was at least working a veto, or trying to. Did she even know what her appointed secretary was doing? And it wasn’t just the Kansas Office of Vital Statistics (OVS) starting trans tracking in 2019; according to the blog you linked, the Kansas Division of Vehicles has been tracking trans people since 2007.

              Representatives for the Division of Vehicles confirmed that, since legalizing driver’s license updates in 2007, the DOV has also tracked trans people. Like the OVS, the DOV created an internal marker that is specific to the process Kansas called “gender reclassification.” Similar to the vital records system, this trans-specific flag gives the DOV the ability to quickly create a list of trans people—an ability it recently utilized to send the revocation letters.

              So the list that sent the letters came from the Dept of Vehicles itself, and was started a dozen years prior to Kelly attaining office.

              If someone’s openly on my “side” I’m not going to shit on them for what they might not even personally be aware of, especially when death threats for being pro-trans have become the norm for public figures.

              As for me, my own personal “side” is not MAGA or anti-MAGA, though these days it works out anti 100% of the time. My own personal “side” is 100% pro-people: living the way they want to live, loving the way they want to love, inhabiting the bodies they want to inhabit, and to support anyone who I think is at least trying to stand up for that, however imperfect and insufficient their efforts are at this moment in time.

              And no. The current hostility toward anyone of a different identity is NOT bipartisan. It is primarily GOP. And while not all Dems are on board, that’s where the majority of your supporters are, because they sure as fuck aren’t on the GOP side, and as you have read, it is still the Kansas GOP supermajority that is rolling this shit out for Kansas like a monster truck without brakes. For all the hairs you’ve so carefully split, you still haven’t convinced me otherwise. But again, thank you for the additional information: on that I do stand corrected, and I do appreciate you taking the time and trouble to correct me on it.

              EDITED to add blog quote and to remove unnecessarily inflammatory language

    • frunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      They might as well have said “THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER”