• kaffiene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wish more people in general would be OK with being wrong. Noone ever learned something new without knowing they’d been wrong

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      107
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s amazing to me that Discovery hasn’t tried to bring Mythbusters back. Instead they double down on Ancient Aliens and Pawnstars garbage.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          3 days ago

          Adam and Jamie were awesome, but I’m certain there are some passionate makers or something out there who could fill the role. It wouldn’t be the same, but it could be it’s own thing. Whoever the new hosts were must have just been the wrong casting, but also I don’t know how much Discovery cared because I didn’t know about it and I was a huge Mythbusters fan. I guess I just didn’t pay attention because Discovery had already killed everything that was worth paying attention to them for by that point.

          • Montagge@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s been a while since I watched them but I recall feeling like the new hosts weren’t genuine. It felt more like a YouTube reaction video than an episode of Mythbusters.

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              37
              ·
              3 days ago

              Mythbusters fundamentally needs to capture the joy of engineering more than the joy of explosions. (Not that those aren’t fun too.)

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          3 days ago

          I remember during the run of Mythbusters either Discovery or History or one of those tried to launch another show to cash in on Mythbusters’ success, it was called Smash Lab, and it’s clear the creation of this show involved a pie chart titled “Elements of Mythbusters by screen time” and there was one pie wedge labelled “explosions.” It didn’t last long IIRC.

        • poke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          From listening to podcasts done by people involved in those attempts to bring the show back, it seems the show runners/studios in charge didn’t understand what made the show good and tried to steer their recreations in bad directions. It does seem like most every host they brought on had good intentions and skillsets, but were held back in some way.

        • idunnololz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          IIRC I read that the hosts hated one another and refuse to work with each other ever again.

          • PorkSoda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            If you’re talking about Adam and Jamie, this is not true and has been repeatedly debunked by both of them.

      • Mountain_Mike_420@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you need you fix Adam savage is very active on YouTube and is just a wonder human being. It’s not MythBusters but Adam was a light during Covid and someone I put on regularly on YouTube.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, I watch him. It’s not Mythbusters, but it’s still entertaining usually, even when he’s doing the most boring things. It really shows how good he was as an entertainer.

          • rosa666parks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            My favorite thing about Adam’s videos is the way they are edited, they leave in some silence so you can see Adam’s head gears working as he’s solving a problem. It sorta feels like we’re solving the problem with him.

      • QuantumStorm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah its a real monkeys paw situation too. Will they be able to catch that same lightning in a jar again without the same cast?

        • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          3 days ago

          If they understood what made it great, maybe. They don’t though, and definitely won’t care to try.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Real Science attracts smart people who want to learn a thing or two about the world, Fake Science attracts the kind of gullible kooks you can sell snake oil and orgonite devices to… and I say this as someone who “wants to believe”

        Same reason why scam e-mails and telemarketers intentionally leave big gaping holes in their stories while using dozens of spelling errors. If you’re the kind of person who can notice things like that, you’re too smart to buy what they’re selling.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    It doesn’t matter how you run because ALLIGATORS WON’T CHASE YOU.

    I used to live in Florida on the edge of a big lake where my landlord had carved out a lagoon that mama gators used to hatch their broods, so there would often be between 50 and 100 little alligators chilling out in my backyard sunning themselves. For fun I would try to sneak up on one of them and poke it on the head just to watch it and all the others scatter into the lagoon. Everybody I told about this thought I was absolutely batshit crazy, but I knew that at the time there had been something like 5 alligator attacks on humans in Florida since the 1940s, always on little children playing in water (I was obviously a little child mentally but physically I was a 200-pound adult man). So I knew I wasn’t risking life or limb doing this. For the record, my sneaking up technique was to stand stock still and only move a step or two towards the gator whenever the wind blew; it seems that the gators just took me for a swaying branch and ignored me.

    What made me stop doing this was one day I happened to look down at what I thought was a big log and realized that it was actually the mama gator, about 12’ long from tip to tail and probably 2’ in diameter at her midsection. I was fairly confident that she wouldn’t attack me on land either - but not that confident.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is why most skepticism based programs don’t work, and Mythbusters did.

    They didn’t try to be smug about it, they didn’t belittle people who believed in the myths, they never brought religion and politics into it, and the biggest pitfall they avoided: They never pretended that the “science was settled” and that they “already knew everything”, they simply did the research and went where the data took them.

    Too many skepticism based programs seem to think the scientific method is running into a church, yelling “FAKE!”, and then running outside to hurl insults at passersby.

    Mythbusters didn’t do that, they skipped the dogma and went straight to the science.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also, most of the myths weren’t “serious”- it wasn’t like they were debunking flat earth or something.

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        I hate that debunking flat earth is now seen as serious rather than a 5th grade science experiment.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        it wasn’t like they were debunking flat earth or something

        Though you could do that. And with equipment and a type of experiment that would make sense on their show. The experiment conducted at the very end of the documentary Behind the Curve is perfect. Great big lasers, a simple and easy-to-visualise pass condition. If they had wanted to, they absolutely could have done it.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean, yes.

          but their myths generally didn’t piss surprisingly large segments of the population off. it was more… the urban legends that gave them an excuse to blow stuff up, shoot stuff, or otherwise crash stuff; all in slow motion.

  • Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    3 days ago

    The Elephant and Mice episode was so wild, because if I remember correctly, the elephant didn’t act afraid of the mouse, it acted afraid it would step on and harm the mouse; as if the elephant had a basic understanding and concern for the wellbeing of another creature conspicuously lacking in many human beasts

    • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yep. Elephants are wonderfully kind creatures. With my very limited understanding of elephant body language, it didn’t look like an ‘oh no, im scared’ it was more ‘oh hey little guy, didn’t see ya there. ill get outta your way.’

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Just smart as hell. This video makes me wonder if elephants legit have a sense of humor:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VOvEFHDOaU

        Animal behavior can be difficult to interpret (and even when descriptions come from experts, I often find myself asking “yeah, but how do we really know that?”), but this looks very close to being like someone who’s known for lighthearted pranks.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          I WANT to believe this but I’ve seen too many elephant videos that turned out to be just elephants trained to do a quirky thing for tourists and there’s someone off camera subtly directing them.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s amazing how intelligent and emotionally mature elephants are. It’s not wonder why people were willing to believe that “Elephants have a moon religion!” line for so long, it seems believable with how often elephants seem to act like chonky humans with a trunk instead of arms.

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    3 days ago

    For anyone missing the show, there was a wonderful project called Streamlined Mythbusters where fans edited each episode down to remove the filler, pre and post ad recaps, etc. They usually also would reorder things so each individual myth was seld contained.

    It’s wonderful, but some episodes legitimately got cut down to be 16 minutes long with no real content loss, which can be kind of jarring.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      There is also Smyths, which is the same thing.

      Unfortunately Mythbusters edits have a tendency to get pulled from the typical video sharing sites rather quickly. I wish someone would make a torrent of the entire series edited this way, and call it a day.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Oh god, I forgot, it was during the “REALITY TV!” boom where marketing and hype had more substance than the shows themselves, and if the show had substance… edit it like it is Reality TV…

      I do not miss that.

    • runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Thanks for the Rec! I definitely miss the show. Adam’s YouTube channel sometimes scratches the itch, but not always.

    • PorkSoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can find a torrent of all of them. I love putting Plex on shuffle when I’m doing chores around the house.

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ive told people this many times, we need to create more room for failure. From school, to jobs, to building businesses, to loans, to health.

    If we can try something because if we fail we can try something else, we would find a hell of a lot more to care about in this world.

    And the most important thing we would care more about is ourselves

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    It make me really sad when I learned that James and Adam were not friend.

    James said their relationship doesn’t really extend beyond the show.

    • Shard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s fine and I think its pretty much the perfect example of a solid professional relationship (no need to be buddies or “like a family”) and what greatness can be achieved when you work with same endgame in mind. They may have disagreed plenty but only because they wanted to achieve the best outcomes possible.

      While they are not friends, if you follow Adam on youtube, you’ll realize there is a huge amount of mutual respect between the two, even to this day.

    • Zozano@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      3 days ago

      I remember being stubborn, being proved wrong, continuing to be stubborn, and being proved wrong even harder, in front of others.

      It’s such a pathetic and embarrassing feeling to be that wrong.

      I don’t want to be wrong a moment longer than I need to be.

      There’s no shame in being corrected, but there is in holding on to shit ideas.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is the right attitude more people should have. But all too often, when people are proven wrong, they genuinely believe that it must be the other person/group, because they cannot accept the emotional consequences of being wrong.

        I know that I’ve had a hard time learning this because growing up I was never held to account for my actions on an emotional level. It was the 80s and 90s, and adults at that time would either shrug it off, or go straight to the nuclear punishment of corporal punishment. Never once would they sit down and talk to you about why what you did was wrong and how to do it better next time. I, anecdotally, believe that a lot of genx suffer this same way. They simply haven’t learned that there is a better way.

        • gibmiser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well, talking to kids and explaining things to them takes time, and it’s basically work. How inconvenient.

          • idiomaddict@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Also, you have to know what a better way to handle a situation is. If someone’s the type of person who hits a kid for misbehavior, maybe they don’t know how to do better.

            My husband and I are in our mid thirties, and are actively holding off on kids until we feel like we’ve gotten better at managing our emotions. Our parents had kids much earlier, and ended up exercising their emotional dysfunction on small children

            • QualifiedKitten@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              I could be completely wrong, but my life experience so far suggests that the best way to get better at something is to put yourself into situations where you have to actually practice the skill. I’ve been fostering cats and kittens for a few years, and I think it has really pushed me to learn how to manage my emotions better.

        • Zozano@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s amazing how social norms have changed.

          I’ve got a two year old, who drives me absolutely insane sometimes. I think if I grew up in my parents culture, where it was acceptable to smack kids or shout at them, I probably would.

          That’s a horrible thing to say, but I’m glad I’m aware of the fact that it’s counter-productive. I’m almost jealous of my child, to know they’ve got someone like me as a father, as opposed to my father.

    • peto@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Or at least use classical conditioning to associate the I’m wrong feeling with the impending new cool facts feeling.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Plus being able to figure out a semilegitimate excuse to blow stuff up. “This could be very dangerous so we’re going to do several things to make it safer. That’s teaching safe lab techniques, so it’s educational!”

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sometimes they called stuff busted because they couldn’t personally do it though, even though the myth involved elite athletics. I was pretty stoked when they brought in an actual ninja to test if ninjas can grab arrows out of the air. The guy actually did catch some arrows, which was quite amazing.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah… There are many pitfalls to doing a Skepticism based program, sadly one of the few Mythbusters DIDN’T avoid was “Well I can’t personally do it, so it’s impossible for everyone!”

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      I liked the one where they tested it you could stop a sword by slapping your palms together to stop the swing like in ninja movies They actually built a machine with rubber hands to simulate it. Long and short of it … No you can’t

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, one that I always think of is the see-saw one where a sky diver’s parachute failed so he aimed for a see-saw with a girl sitting on one end which resulted in the girl launched shot upwards and then landing safely on top of a building.

      Their first test used basically a metal plank on a fulcrum and the forces did more to bend the plank than they did to launch the girl and she didn’t get high enough.

      Their second attempt used a see-saw that was built using suspension bridge tech to essentially make it instructable, resulting in fatal forces from the launch. At this point, they called it busted.

      But I see two unrealistic extremes where reality would exist somewhere in the middle where see-saws are designed to not break easily but not to the point of being indestructible and there might be a sweet spot where the forces are high enough to launch girl several stories up but not high enough that she dies from the forces.

      Also, for the bull in a china shop one, I’m guessing that saying resulted from a bull ending up inside a china shop during a running of the bulls event, where stress would be high and there wouldn’t be an easy and obvious path out on the other side, plus maybe a shopkeeper suddenly trying to get it out in a panic. I think that would get the expected result, especially after a few shelves have broken and each step makes more broken sounds.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    My favorite is the fan mounted to the boat blowing the sail causing the boat to move. I mean there are a shitload more experiments in fun episodes that are far better and more entertaining, but this one is my favorite because it flies in the face of logic. It shouldn’t work. My brain rejects the possibility. But physics and fluid flow work otherwise and I found it pointlessly infuriating only because I’d been unassailable in my confidence that it couldn’t possibly work. Yet there it is with a perfectly logical explanation. I still find it irritating even if I accept the reality of it. (Episode 165 if anyone’s wondering)

    That said, I still follow Adam on various platforms. That enthusiasm and joy of discovery is all still there, along with some maturity and some life observations. Literally the only celebrity figure I follow.