• DasRav [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder why it’s coded like that…oh right it’s because it’s easier to write one version of the text then to have to find/replace words dynamically based on a check function that is also per character based. There is a good chance you’d need to re-code a ton of the game to account for this change and it would be to absolutely no benefit.

    These people do not think and do not want to expand any of their own effort, because all their effort is earmarked for getting heated over nothing.

    • Speaker [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not really dynamic. You’re just defining variables and then interpolating the value in some template. If the game can handle a custom character name, custom pronouns is a fairly small addition.

      “Oh, that $item? That belongs to ${char.name}! It’s ${char.possessive} $item.”

      • DasRav [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It would have a list to pick from for NPCs and ask the player to either also pick form it, or enter their own neopronoun and how it would be used in a sentence. This wouldn’t make it harder to do, if you’re already putting the time in to code all of it.

    • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      theory-gary I believe every game should allow the player to arbitrarily specify pronouns all the time forever. I came to this conclusion after discovering that the hit TWINE game The Wayhaven Chronicles has provisions for theoretically infinite pronouns, because pronouns are a text field internally, but the game only uses “he”, “she” and “they” based on the player specifying their gender as man, woman or enby. We must do better.


      Remember to enable JPEG-XL support in your browser, even on your phone!

      • DasRav [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree with this for the player. My point is that it’ more work to do it and that the devs of an indie strategy game likely did not put their main focus on that complexity. I don’t even know how the game actually works since I haven’t played it, but if it has mission briefings, chances are they are just written gender neutral because it was easier.

        It’s the same as with Stardew Valley and gender-agnostic dating. Caring about gender would have added work to the game so the dev didn’t do it and put that time into other things.

        • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Caring about gender would have added work to the game so the dev didn’t do it and put that time into other things.

          I hate this deeply, actually specifically about Stardew and its ilk. Stardew’s nobody-is-anything approach I am no fan of. It’s not even like you can play it genderless style, so it’s not even really “not caring about gender”, it’s just writing every bachelor and bachelorette questline broadly enough that they can fit both binary genders! Big sigh.


          Remember to enable JPEG-XL support in your browser, even on your phone!

              • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                Just play as the gender a given character is attracted to if you wanna access alternate universes, lmao.


                Remember to enable JPEG-XL support in your browser, even on your phone!

              • I believe that straight men should be locked out of romance in video games and in other places.

                “Why aren’t there any dating apps for straight men!?” “Because straight men aren’t allowed to access dating apps, duh.”

                “Why is there no such thing as straight porn!?” “Obviously because only gay people are responsible enough to have access to porn, just like with guns.”

          • DasRav [any, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Valid point. I can forgive it for games like Stardew that were literally made by one person, though (at least at the time that decision was made, obviously there is a team now that the game had it’s enormous success). You have to make a lot of decisions about what to cut and what to keep when you are working on such a project on your own.

            Now if triple A does it though…fuck that.

            • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Actually I’m gonna push back on this too. Since there are only the two binary genders, I refuse to believe that altering this would have made Stardew impossible to make. Everyone in the valley being textually bisexual might really enhance the game, too, if you went that direction. I think the bigger issue is that that’s not the game Concernedape wanted to make, and so you have this extremely lifeless set of romance quests that is at times less enjoyable than literally swapping the protagonist gender on Friends of Mineral Town.


              Remember to enable JPEG-XL support in your browser, even on your phone!

              • DasRav [any, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                I think the writing in the game is fine. Like, not stellar, sure, but fine.

                So how much work would it be? The way it’s now, all the game cares about is that there is a bunch of NPCs. The male/Female selector is something only the player character would have, but they do have it because of character creation. So the flag exists. Let’s assume you haven’t made any of it yet and want to add as little as possible extra content:

                1. You need to decide the dating preferences of 10 people. More now, but 10 at game release. This would not be difficult or time-consuming, you just add a check. How many characters should have which orientation? Up to you, but I’d say make one set of gays and one set of bi/pans would feel realistic for that small a community. For the Bi/Pans they work like now, for everyone else you check the gender flag of the player and go from there. The gay and bi character of the same gender could then be default partners for each other if the player doesn’t go for them.

                2. Check and display who is eligible in the NPC overview. Trivial to do, but I want to mention everything.

                3. You’d need to write some amount of differing blurbs depending on player gender for at least these 8 bachelors, since they need to convey their preference in some way. Like Alex telling the male PC that he has a great ass from farm work or what have you. This is not a lot of work, but it is some work.

                4. you need distinct friendship cutscenes for any character that potentially won’t go out with the player. So you need to make these distinct scenes for 8 of the bachelors. Minimally, you would need to change the 8 heart events only for this, if you rewrite the first set to be more ambiguous about if you’re dating etc., but I’d say you realistically need to rewrite them from 4 or 6 hearts onwards for at least some of them. good news is though, you don’t need an extra 10 heart scene, because you can only get there if they would date you anyway. Let’s say that’s 2.5 scenes per bachelor, so 20 new cutscenes to make.

                That is kinda it. How long does it take to make one of those scenes? I dunno but some of them have a fair bit of unique assets. But that’s for the dates, which are supposed to be big moments. You can get by setting your friendship cutscenes in town and without many custom assets.

                I dunno, sounds like a week or two of full-time work to me. So not something that would have made the game not come out, but an appreciable chunk of labor to do.

                Lastly, when I played the game when it came out…was that in 2014? Fuck I am old. I remember the ‘everyone dates everyone’ feel of it fondly and not as a negative. Certainly better then having to play male Shepard to date Tali in Mass Effect.

                • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  You’d need to write some amount of differing blurbs depending on player gender

                  Extremely loud incorrect buzzer noise. The easy solution would just be to make everyone gay, which really would sort it out. For what it’s worth you can also write bi or even pansexual characters, but they have to be believable about it. Pans better actually reflect attraction regardless of gender, is all, instead of this numb lifeless thing that bends to the player.

                  you need distinct friendship cutscenes for any character that potentially won’t go out with the player.

                  I mean, do you? The idea of platonic “social links” is not a bad one but the Harvest Moon games never had it to my knowledge, so you could always just cut this. Plus, if you’re feeling brave you’d have the ability to keep it platonicstyle with characters of compatible gender, to avoid amatonomrativity. That would be even more work, though, because actually fully reflecting gender and romance and shit is pretty hard, which is probably why Stardew just takes the least-resistance approach of “minimum flexibility required for whatever the player wants”.

                  I remember the ‘everyone dates everyone’ feel of it fondly and not as a negative. Certainly better then having to play male Shepard to date Tali in Mass Effect.

                  I mean, have you ever heard anyone gripe about this before now? I’m a weird little freak and I hate joy. First off, I did not even know you could bed Tali, that’s hilarious. Also though… Why not just play ManShep if that’s your bag…? She’s a straight lady, do you wanna date a straight lady?

                  Fwiw Mass Effect does actually gate romance path by gender, which goes to show that you have to do more than just that to be good. I also sailed through my first ME playthroughs without even the implication of romance from any of the characters, which was weird and kinda funny.


                  Remember to enable JPEG-XL support in your browser, even on your phone!

    • Collatz_problem [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fallen London has options to select character gender:

      • A lady
      • A gentleman
      • My dear sir, there are individuals roaming the streets of Fallen London at this very moment with the faces of squid! Squid! Do you ask them their gender? And yet you waste our time asking me trifling and impertinent questions about mine? It is my own business, sir, and I bid you good day.
      • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Afaik English Bible translations mainly used generic masculine but notably NIV in 2011 started using they instead (which is just more clear for a modern English translation). The original Hebrew and Greek both mostly use generic masculine pronouns, I think. Yes, chuds have been calling the translation woke or some equivalent for 15 years.

        But talking about language beyond trends within contemporary English I think kind of shows the artificiality of the dispute, because for example first person pronouns in all languages mentioned here are gender neutral. Do we need to start having Mary refer to herself as atashi? Why do we need to declare the gender of others but not ourselves? If it’s self-evident in our case (a silly idea even in cisnormative society because we are talking about script here with the Bible), what makes it less self-evident in the case of referring to others? But they would pretend the issue is preserving the integrity of the translation, to which one must point out that Hebrew and Koine Greek also use gender for objects and abstract concepts, like Romance languages and many others do, but there is no outcry that when Jesus calls himself “the way, the truth, and the life,” we must make sure the reader knows that all three of those nouns are feminine.

        • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          but there is no outcry that when Jesus calls himself “the way, the truth, and the life,” we must make sure the reader knows that all three of those nouns are feminine.

          found my new thing to be a crank about

        • Wertheimer [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Even better, ὁδὸς can also be masculine as well as feminine, so the Gospel of John chose to make it “way” feminine when it didn’t have to.

          Edit: Ah, fuck, I was wrong, the masculine ὁδὸς means “threshold.” I was thinking of another m/f noun beginning with omicron.

  • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been looking forward to the day that these people get scolded out of whatever room they’re doing this shit in

    It must be exhausting being the mirror in their bathroom. The monologues that mirror has listened to. By gods.

      • pronounced ɱɐɢ @lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not to mention how fucking horny they are. Can’t go one line in the community section without seeing softcore porn. I have sexual content turned off. Probably so much more upsetting to me because I’m ace.

        • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          Same. I’m like.

          “Bro, you’re an American puritan! You think sexuality is a sin! Why are you engaging in something you think is sinful?!”

          I’m sure their logic is “I’m such a perfect little boy for Jeebus, it’s my reward for conforming so well.”

          • WokePalpatine [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            Gamer-nazis aren’t puritans. Puritanism doesn’t even really exist anymore, but the faction who are trying to sensor sexual content via payment processors are a different group from the very consumerist gamer-nazis.

            • xenon [pup/pup's, she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              2 days ago

              “Puritanism doesn’t even really exist anymore” he says in a thread full of people complaining about “gooner games” and treating sexual artwork like its inherently lesser than our pure christianity approved natoslop and being horny is a sin weird gooner thing

              its not like sex workers have been systemically oppressed for decades or anything lol

              im sure it doesnt exist tho, wonder-who-thats-for

              • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think large parts of hexbear still have this mindset, which I struggle to be shocked at but am disappointed in yea anybody who uses “gooner” as a descriptor I immediately don’t trust


                Remember to enable JPEG-XL support in your browser, even on your phone!

              • WokePalpatine [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                Puritianism isn’t just stodgy conservatives, it’s a specific strain. “Gooner” insults here are from more like annoverlap between male-negative patriarchy and liberal-style feminism where hating a specific kind of low-totem man is okay. It’s why no one here applies “goon” adjective to romantasy stuff when it’s sociologically similar.

                Capitalism killed puritanism the same way it killed a bunch of other feudal ideologies.

                • xenon [pup/pup's, she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  “its a specific strain” ah yes there is no strain of extremely sex negative patriarchal people under capitalism, they simply dont exist? lol? this is such a nothing statement

                  and famously women dont get horny or get off or play horny video games?

                  people dont apply “goon” to romantasy stuff because they like romantasy and can pretend its a completely different thing. famously reactionaries are extremely consistent with their beliefs and how they apply them,

                  you can jump through as many hoops as you want to say “no no im not a puritan this is bog standard reactionary slop not a super special strain of reactionary slop” but that doesnt change the fact you sound the exact same as the person that calls a woman in a bikini “goon bait” and call people who look at pornography “dgenerates”

                  or complaining about “unnecessary sex scenes” in movies because you are incapable of wrapping your head around sex not being an inherently lesser act, or that it could have any meaning outside of “make babies”

                  its the same exact bullshit used to oppress people for literal centuries just with a fresh coat of paint expunged by the exact same type of people

              • BeanisBrain [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                Don’t forget that the concept of expressing one’s sexuality in creative works didn’t exist until capitalists invented it in the 20th century! Horny media is a novel cognitohazard that will fry your brain and definitely not something humans have been doing since before recorded history /s

              • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 days ago

                its not like sex workers have been systemically oppressed for decades or anything lol

                Centuries or millenia, but I don’t think people here are complaining about sex workers, they are comaining about, e.g. “misogynistic haremslop visual novel/rpg #5,000,000,000,000,002” and things like that.

                Edit: sorry, the community section, so I guess they mean “misogynistic sex slave dungeon slop #10,000,000,000,000,000,003”

                • xenon [pup/pup's, she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  complaining about the existence of sexual artwork and acting like its inherently lesser because its sexual its still puritanism lmao

                  “generic” or not doesnt matter, and the problem there is misogyny and heteronormativity. literally that exact same misogyny argument is used for sex work lmao. also creating sexual artwork is a form of sex work.

                  wonder-who-thats-for

          • h0ll0w5p4c3 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It’s funny, I’m ace and have every mature filter turned off yet don’t see this stuff that much. Not that I don’t see some random hentai games advertised but it is relatively minor when I go on steam.

            I guess I don’t browse through all the mods and it could be community specific.

            • Robert_Kennedy_Jr [xe/xem, xey/xem]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah idk it seems like any game with a large modding community ends up having a porn wing of creators, particularly if the art style is already anime-esque. I remember Darkest Dungeon being particularly egregious and has pages of big titty waifus

              • h0ll0w5p4c3 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                I have played Darkest dungeon but I don’t think I modded it.

                I have modded Bethesda games and know of the mods for those games but I guess I choose to not browse the more adult mods.

                I also don’t have an issue with suggestive art or big titty waifus because I can choose not to engage with it or scroll past them. I also have mature filters turned off because sometimes I do want to engage with stuff made by queer creators which can be suggestive.

            • pronounced ɱɐɢ @lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I tend to see them when scrolling below a game in my library, under the news, that’s where I generally see the community content.

              • h0ll0w5p4c3 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                I don’t tend to go on the community parts often. But when I have I don’t recall seeing lots of hentai either. I do see maybe one or two games store page thumbnails and thats it. It isn’t something I have issues with becauae those generally aren’t overly explicit.

          • pronounced ɱɐɢ @lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Until I turned on (very light) sexual content, I couldn’t see Brütal legend. I fucking love that game and steam hid it from me because it didn’t show even very light sexual content.

            That comes with the downside of being shown gooner content on game community pages and being advertised straight up hentai games. No in-between.

    • Ridiculous doesn’t even begin to describe imo. Steam forums are a genuine cesspool of nazis. I had to stop myself from going there unless I’m looking for something specific. Steam forums emit as much Hitler particles as 4chan.

  • Abracadaniel [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    To be fair it might strain believability for everyone to use they/them, and using they when “they” don’t would be misgendering, uh, them (lol).