joker-dancing

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Georgia would be the state most likely to do so. If Trump gets convicted of a state crime, that might kill his nomination.

      • DragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Libs are deadass hoping Trump pulls a voldemort and defeats himself by breaking a rule rather than dems actually defeating Trump fair and square.

        …And then DeSantis wins in a landslide after Trump endorses him and #AvengeTrump goes viral.

        • HobbitFoot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, it is more hoping that the rule of law catches up to Trump before the election.

          But if you want DeSantis to win, I’m probably not going to be able to convince you otherwise.

          • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Rule of law? Dude is walking around giving rallies. It took you dumbasses 2, 3 years? to actually get him sitting in a courtroom. The rule of law would’ve put him in front of a firing squad 48 hours after January 6, but we live in la la land where the instigator of a failed coup led by boat dealers get to play golf while we pay for his security.

            Your rule of law is a joke. Your party only wields power when it comes to undermining poor people. Otherwise the democrats would’ve banned the GOP and arrested every single one of their politicians. If you call them as undemocratic terrorists, then where is the rule of law when they get to stand next to you in the halls of power?

          • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            1 year ago

            Given the sclerotic and partisan nature of the US “rule of law” isn’t it irresponsible of them to hope that the courts solve the problem for them instead of trying to run a convincing campaign for their side?

            • HobbitFoot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That assumes the legal option is the only one being pursued.

              There are tons of posts here calling out the political arguments that inflation is falling and the economy isn’t in a recession as political propaganda that may be technically accurate but hide the suffering of common Americans and should therefore be treated as nothing but propaganda to be forgotten.

              • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not sure how that deals with the problem? Joe is deeply unpopular, people don’t like him and whether you think it’s fair or not people are not enjoying the way things are going right now. Doubling down on “voters feel wrong about how things are going and should vote for this unpopular old man” is not actually pursuing an electoral strategy.

                You suggested they were hoping the law would solve this problem, which is more coherent than suggesting that they’re trying to campaign by calling everybody who dislikes their candidate (almost 2/3 of voters, last count) wrong over and over.

                • HobbitFoot
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I suggested it was an option, but not the only one. Others believed that I was suggesting it was the only option.

            • HobbitFoot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why not? That would definitely own the Libs, wouldn’t it?

                • HobbitFoot
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, President DeSantis would be fucking hilarious.

                  • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    18
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It would absolutely be funny watching libs spin and steam and blame again instead of ever asking if there’s a good reason why people hate Democrats. That doesn’t mean it’s good, but it’s definitely funny to watch y’all twist yourselves in knots trying desperately to ignore reality

              • DragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think we got off on the wrong foot here. I’m not some kind of GOP cheerleader, I’m mostly making a joke about how infuriatingly lucky the GOP is, and part of it is that democrats are controlled opposition.