• riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    The new (not that new anymore) macbook PROs do have separate DC input, HDMI, SD card slot and HDMI. And to be honest, for an average computer user those ports are pretty useless, however if you do need them it comes at a rather steep premium.

  • Speiser0@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    The 2nd from top has two lightning sparks. To charge the laptop, I have to connect them to the two holes in my outlet, right?

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I’m no Apple fanboy (never owned a product of theirs and never will) but to be fair, those two USB-C ports can do everything the old, removed ports can do and more. The real crime here is not putting enough of them on the laptop.

    Edit: The only port I’ll lament the removal of is the headphone jack. USB-C headphones are rare, adapters get lost, and bluetooth headphones compress the audio and have input lag. Everything else can go, though, and won’t be missed. (Okay fine ethernet can stay too.)

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    They remove the extra ports because they take up space in the board.

    That aside if you’re buying Mac you took it from yourself. No one made you buy it.

  • j0hax@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I believe that the topmost (M1?) MacBook still has a headphone Jack on the other (right-hand) side.

    PS: by no means am I an apple fanboy, but I inherited an old Retina MacBook Pro that I installed Linux on and now use as my daily driver. It still holds up extremely well considering it’s 11 years old. The only ports it’s really missing is an RJ45 and (nowadays) USB-C.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    And look how much thinner. A large part of that is the need for physical ports which although they may loom small on the outside, also take up space inside for the boards that convert signals. Now those conversions happen in the dongles if needed.

    The real problem is that USB didn’t implement a hub standard so most hubs have had to use old hub standards and just have a single USB-C connector and the rest USB-A, hdmi, etc. There haven’t been many purely USB-C to USB-C hubs to allow for connecting lots of USB-C devices to a single port and usually they end up losing features or splitting bandwidth instead of sharing the full bandwidth.

  • Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    To make our laptops look clean and minimalistic, they made us buy a bunch of dongles and adapters.

    Screw it, I’m buying a rugged laptop with the thickness of a desktop PC next

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I dont know why this is controversial. I’m way more happy with 4x USB-C, than 5 unique ports, that will likely never be used on a regular basis, even when they were relevant

  • JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 hours ago

    USB-C does a lot of heavy lifting. Also, MagSafe™ is still there. A little surprised there is also a SD card slot. And a HDMI port. Not complaining about their inclusion, and I do use them regularly, but why did the dongle company give these to us?

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This pic leaves out the latest generation of MacBook that brings back some of those ports.

    I guess OP would rather generate outrage upvotes, rather than spread the truth.